Abstract

PurposeCorneal transplantations are the commonest allogenic transplant surgeries performed worldwide. Transplantable grade donor cornea is a finite resource. There is thus an impetus for eye banks to optimize the use of each harvested cornea, and clinicians to minimize the risks of graft rejection and failure. With better survival and lower rejection rates, anterior lamellar keratoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative technique to full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty, for the treatment of corneal stromal diseases. This study evaluated the effects of donor-recipient age- and sex-matching on the outcomes of eyes that had undergone deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) surgeries.DesignObservational cross-sectional study (national corneal graft registry data).SubjectsAll DALK surgeries performed in a tertiary ophthalmic hospital over an 11-year period.MethodsTo analyse the effects of donor-recipient sex-matching, transplantations were classified as “presumed H-Y incompatible” (male donor to female recipient) or “presumed H-Y compatible” (all other donor-recipient sex combinations). For age-matching, differences in donor and recipient ages were calculated. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate the influence of donor-recipient sex-matching and age-matching on graft failure and rejection.Main Outcome MeasuresRates of graft failure and rejection within each group.Results401 eyes were included. 271 (67.6%) transplants were presumed H-Y compatible. 29 (7.2%) grafts failed and 9 (2.2%) grafts rejected. There were trends of lower hazard ratios (HRs) in graft failure and rejection in the presumed H-Y compatible group [HRs: 0.59 (95% CI 0.20–1.77, p = 0.34) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.22–3.89, p = 0.926), respectively]. Median difference in age between recipients and donors was 15.0 years (IQR −2.8–34.3). The HRs of graft failure and rejection were not influenced by donor-recipient age [HRs per 1-year increase in age difference: 0.995 (95% CI 0.98–1.01, p = 0.483) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.99–1.03, p = 0.394), respectively].ConclusionIn eyes that had undergone DALK surgeries, no significant influence of donor-recipient sex- or age-matching on graft rejection and failure was observed. Without strong evidence and the limitations of obtaining sample sizes required for an adequately powered study, the benefits of sex- and age-matching of donors and recipients during graft allocation for DALK surgeries is currently inconclusive.

Highlights

  • Corneal transplantations are the most common allogenic transplant surgeries performed worldwide [1, 2]

  • Using data from the Singapore national transplant registry, we evaluated the effects of donorrecipient age- and sex- matching on the surgical outcomes of eyes that had undergone deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) surgeries

  • To analyse the effects of donor-recipient sex-matching and presumed H-Y compatibility on graft rejection and failure, we looked at presumed H-Y incompatible grafts [male donor to female recipient (M-F)] and compared them to presumed H-Y compatible grafts [male donor to male recipient (M-M), female donor to male recipient (F-M), female donor to female recipient (F-F)]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Corneal transplantations are the most common allogenic transplant surgeries performed worldwide [1, 2]. Over the past two decades there has been a paradigm shift in the surgical treatment of corneal diseases to perform selective tissue transplantation i.e., anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) or endothelial keratoplasty (EK), where only diseased layers of the cornea are replaced [2, 9, 12,13,14]. In ALK, the anterior diseased layers of the recipient’s cornea are replaced [15]; in EK, a posterior lamellar keratoplasty technique, the diseased corneal endothelium of the recipient is replaced [16] These two “lamellar” keratoplasty techniques, have been shown to achieve lower risks of immunological graft rejection and improved graft survival rates [9, 17,18,19,20,21,22]. Graft rejection and failure do occur following all types of corneal transplantations [23, 24]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call