Abstract

The most frequent and expensive cause category of compensable loss is manual material handling (MMH). In an attempt to minimize these losses, refinement of existing MMH guidelines is a component of redesigning high risk MMH jobs. In the development of our present MMH guidelines (Snook & Ciriello, 1991), maximum acceptable forces (MAFs) of pulling were assumed to respond similarly to pushing at longer distances for male and female industrial workers. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of 7.6m and 15.2m distances on both initial and sustained MAFs of pushing and pulling at a frequency of 1 min-1. A psychophysical methodology was used whereby the subjects were asked to select a workload without “straining themselves or without becoming unusually tired, weakened, overheated or out of breath.” Ten subjects worked 40 min at each push or pull task within a 4-hour test that included other MMH tasks. The results revealed that initial and sustained MAFs were not significantly different between pushing and pulling at both the 7.6m and 15.2m distance. However, task time was significantly longer for pulling at both distances. It was concluded that our existing guidelines present an accurate estimate of MAFs at the longer pull distances for female industrial workers

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.