Abstract

This study aims to expand the current understanding of how corporate social responsibility (CSR) appeals and sources in brand-related messages activate different dimensions of persuasion knowledge and interplay in influencing consumers’ behavioral intentions in the context of Instagram. We conducted an online experiment with a 3 (source: brand versus influencer without sponsorship disclosure versus influencer with sponsorship disclosure) × 2 (CSR appeals: presence versus absence) × 2 (product type: bottled water versus sofa covers) mixed design. The findings indicate that CSR appeals decreased consumers’ critical evaluations of advertising and increased purchase intentions. In addition, sponsorship disclosure raised consumers’ advertising recognition. The brand was less likely to trigger conceptual and attitudinal persuasion knowledge than was the influencer. The overall findings suggest that CSR appeals benefit a brand by reducing consumers’ critical attitudes toward an advertisement, especially when the brand promotes its own product rather than using an influencer.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.