Abstract

In this study, not only the effects of cryogenic processing on the wear of AISI M2 punches but also the effects of punch wear on the hole edge geometry of DIN EN 10111‐98 sheet metal control arm parts were investigated. The hole geometry changes are generally associated with punch wear and process parameters. Piercing operations were performed using eccentric press on 2.5‐mm‐thick sheet metal control arm parts with circular and slot AISI M2 tool steel punches. The punches were traditionally heat treated. The others were cryogenically treated at −145°C in addition to the conventional heat treatment. Weight losses were measured for punch wear assessments; furthermore, SEM and OM images were analyzed. The hole edge geometries of the selected parts were measured with a contour measuring machine in the specified number of blanks. So, no damage was done to the products for measurements. The cryogenic process resulted in a significantly low amount of retained austenite and caused uniformly distributed thin carbide precipitates. Reduction of retained austenite and formation of fine carbide particles led to increase in hardness values. It was found that untreated circular punch wear weight losses were approximately 40% higher than those of cryogenically treated samples. The untreated slot punch change rate was about 106% higher than that of the cryogenically treated samples. The wear process during the punching was faster and greater for the untreated punches. Fatigue microcracks were more common at the cutting edge of the untreated punches. However, abrasive wear was generally observed in cryogenically treated punches. The edge geometry values in the circular holes were at least two times higher than those in the slot holes of untreated samples. At the end of the industrial piercing process, it was determined that the M2 tool steel punch wear rates were decreased by cryogenic treatment, and the size changes of the hole geometry of the punches of the DIN EN 10111‐98 control arm parts were more economic and with a better quality.

Highlights

  • In this study, the effects of cryogenic processing on the wear of AISI M2 punches and the effects of punch wear on the hole edge geometry of DIN EN 10111-98 sheet metal control arm parts were investigated. e hole geometry changes are generally associated with punch wear and process parameters

  • Long-lasting dies and punches, more strokes, and fewer wastes have to be produced in order to compete in today’s markets. e quality of the punched parts is generally assessed by criteria such as bore edge geometry and burr height. ese criteria are influenced by machining parameters, punch properties, and punch wear [6, 7]. e punch material and geometry can be held responsible for the rapid and excessive wear of the punch bits

  • It was found that heat treatment (HT) circular punch wear weight losses were approximately 40% higher. is rate was about 106% higher for HT slot punches. e increase in weight loss and induced wear resistance in the HT punches were reported for the M2 tool steels [10,11,12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The effects of cryogenic processing on the wear of AISI M2 punches and the effects of punch wear on the hole edge geometry of DIN EN 10111-98 sheet metal control arm parts were investigated. e hole geometry changes are generally associated with punch wear and process parameters. The effects of cryogenic processing on the wear of AISI M2 punches and the effects of punch wear on the hole edge geometry of DIN EN 10111-98 sheet metal control arm parts were investigated. At the end of the industrial piercing process, it was determined that the M2 tool steel punch wear rates were decreased by cryogenic treatment, and the size changes of the hole geometry of the punches of the DIN EN 10111-98 control arm parts were more economic and with a better quality. E punching parameters of the press machine, type, thickness, die Advances in Materials Science and Engineering clearance, and piercing forces of the workpiece were found to affect the hole edge geometry in previous studies [4, 5].

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.