Abstract

The practice of corporate venture capital (CVC) has been widely adopted by corporations that invest in highly disruptive start-ups with the aim of fueling innovation and gain strategic advantages. Even if a wide consensus exists on the strategic benefits and performance of CVC investors in the North American venture capital industry, scarce information is available on the European CVC ecosystem. Therefore, the scope of this research is to investigate whether CVC activity, measured as the number of investments, deal size, and the number of realized exits is beneficial for value creation and innovation for European listed companies. Using a panel of CVC investors linked to European listed firms, it is found evidence that CVC activity creates firm value in the period under consideration (2008–2019), confirming North American’s past evidence. Surprisingly, exits convey a negative effect on firm value, suggesting that CVC performance may not be satisfactory enough. Moreover, when considering innovation, evidence is presented that investing in rounds with a higher deal size positively affects investor’s patenting levels, indicating that the later the start-up’s stage in its life cycle, the higher the possibility for the CVC investor to effectively absorb its technology. The relationship is true also for lagged CVC activity, confirming deferred effects on innovation demonstrated on US companies. The findings shed light on the European CVC ecosystem and give room for additional research on CVC investors’ exit performance and co-investors’ benefits on patenting levels

Highlights

  • Innovation is a key aspect in firms‘ ability to satisfy the market demand for new products and services

  • corporate venture capital (CVC) parent companies have a technological interest in innovative start-ups operating in their same industry because they can get a ―window‖ on new technologies (Benson & Ziedonis, 2009) by tracking the latest innovations put in place by new ventures

  • The fixed-effects model has been preferred over the generalized least squares (GLS) random effects model after performing the Hausman specification test, which reported a p-value small enough to reject the null hypothesis that individual effects are uncorrelated with the other regressors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Innovation is a key aspect in firms‘ ability to satisfy the market demand for new products and services. Firms are compelled to put in place different kinds of innovation strategies to defend their competitive predominance and to increase their competitive advantage (Drover et al, 2017). Investments in internal R&D, partnerships, alliances (Pisano, 2015), and corporate venture capital (CVC) are certainly the most common strategies to pursue innovation. CVC parent companies have a technological interest in innovative start-ups operating in their same industry because they can get a ―window‖ on new technologies (Benson & Ziedonis, 2009) by tracking the latest innovations put in place by new ventures. The innovation performance of corporate investors increases with the diversity of their start-up portfolio, at least until the achievement of an optimum level

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call