Abstract

The international, phase III, multi-centre AZA-001 trial demonstrated azacitidine (AZA) is the first treatment to significantly extend overall survival (OS) in higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients (Fenaux (2007) Blood 110 817). The current treatment paradigm, which is based on a relationship between complete remission (CR) and survival, is increasingly being questioned (Cheson (2006) Blood 108 419). Results of AZA-001 show CR is sufficient but not necessary to prolong OS (List (2008) Clin Oncol 26 7006). Indeed, the AZA CR rate in AZA-001 was modest (17%), while partial remission (PR, 12%) and haematological improvement (HI, 49%) were also predictive of prolonged survival. This analysis was conducted to assess the median number of AZA treatment cycles associated with achievement of first response, as measured by IWG 2000-defined CR, PR or HI (major + minor). The number of treatment cycles from first response to best response was also measured.

Highlights

  • For the 91 pts who achieved an IWG response, the median number of cycles to first response was three, 81% of pts achieved a first response by six cycles, and 90% achieved a first response by nine cycles

  • While many pts achieving a haematological response with AZA do so in early treatment cycles, continued AZA dosing can further improve pt responses

  • In the AZA-001 study, a significant overall survival (OS) benefit was observed compared with conventional care regimen (CCR)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Patients (pts) with higher risk MDS (FAB: RAEB, RAEB-T, or CMML and IPSS: Int-2 or High) were included. Pts were randomized to AZA (75 mg/m2/d SC x 7d q 28d) or to a conventional care regimen (CCR). AZA treatment was continued up to disease progression (or unacceptable toxicity), regardless of haematological response.

Results
Conclusions
Conflicting interests
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call