The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort

Abstract

The effectiveness of postlaryngectomy communication methods (esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and electrolaryngeal speech) has been primarily evaluated using functional outcomes. This evaluation neglects the importance of listeners and their influence on communicative effectiveness. Listener comfort (LC), or the ease with which a listener interacts with alaryngeal speakers, may provide an important index of communicative effectiveness. The present study investigated the use of LC in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of alaryngeal speech modes, as well as evaluating the influence of contextual cues used to elicit ratings on listener judgments of all three alaryngeal modes. Thirty-three naïve listeners provided independent ratings of LC for 39 alaryngeal speech samples using a visual analogue scaling procedure. Each group of listeners rated alaryngeal speech in three imagined listening conditions (Telephone Conversation, Social Situation, and a non-specified Control Condition). To analyze LC ratings obtained, a 3×3 mixed factor analysis of variance was conducted. A significant interaction effect between alaryngeal speech mode and listening condition (P=0.04) was identified. Overall, pairwise comparisons of alaryngeal speech mode indicated that listeners were more comfortable when presented with tracheoesophageal speech samples compared to those of esophageal and electrolaryn geal speakers. Our data suggest that LC ratings are influenced by alaryngeal speech mode. Tracheoesophagea speech was perceived to have the most favorable LC ratings compared to the other alaryngeal speech modes in all listening conditions. Contextual cues (i.e., social condition and telephone condition) did not have an effect on LC ratings.