Abstract

PurposeAlthough investigative interviewers receive training in interviewing techniques, they often fail to comply with recommended practices. Interviewers are required to actively listen, accurately remember information, think of questions to ask, make judgements, and seek clarification, whilst conducting interviews with witnesses, victims, or suspects. The current study examined the impact of increased cognitive load on mock interviewers’ recall of a witness’s account.MethodParticipants took the role of an investigative interviewer in one of three conditions, high cognitive load (HCL), moderate cognitive load (MCL), or no cognitive load (NCL). Participants watched a video‐recorded free narrative of a child witness during which they followed condition‐relevant task instructions. Each participant rated their perceived cognitive load during their task and then recalled (free and cued recall) the content of the witness’s account.ResultsParticipants in the HCL and MCL conditions perceived higher cognitive load and demonstrated poorer performance on the free recall task than those in the NCL condition. Participants in the HCL condition demonstrated poorer performance on the cued recall task compared to participants in the NCL condition.ConclusionsThe cognitive demands required to complete an investigative interview task led to an increased perceived cognitive load and had a negative impact on recall performance for mock interviewers. Accurately recalling what has been reported by a witness is vital during an investigation. Inaccurate recall can impact on interviewers’ questioning and their compliance with recommended interviewing practices. Developing and practising interview techniques may help interviewers to better cope with the high cognitive demands of investigative interviewing.

Highlights

  • Despite having knowledge of, and receiving training in, recommended interviewing techniques, interviewers in real-world settings do not always follow best practice guidelines (Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate, 2014; Powell & Barnett, 2015; SchreiberCompo et al, 2012)

  • The current study explored the cognitive demands of a mock interview task and tested the effects of cognitive load on the recall of a witness’s account

  • Tukey HSD post-hoc comparisons showed there was no significant difference between perceived cognitive load (PCL) scores for participants in the high cognitive load (HCL) and moderate cognitive load (MCL) conditions (p = .209)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Receiving training in, recommended interviewing techniques, interviewers in real-world settings do not always follow best practice guidelines (Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate, 2014; Powell & Barnett, 2015; SchreiberCompo et al, 2012). There are, an abundance of guidelines, which provide advice to practitioners for the optimal approach to obtaining precise and complete statements from interviewees (Bull, 2010; Hershkowitz, 2011; Oxburgh et al, 2015) Adhering to these guidelines remains a challenge for investigative interviewers (Lamb, 2016; Schreiber-Compo et al, 2012). Cognitive load is the mental workload placed on individuals when they are required to undertake activities (Hart & Staveland, 1988; Van Acker et al, 2018) It signifies working memory use and the demands placed on cognitive resources when carrying out multiple and competing tasks (Dias et al, 2018; Engstro€m et al, 2013). The attentional demands required to perform complex tasks may lead to cognitive load and errors, or a reduction in performance (Engle & Kane, 2004; O’Donnell & Eggemeier, 1986)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call