Abstract

To examine the performance of non-smokers (n = 24), light smokers (n = 22, mean 6.5 cigarettes per day) and heavy smokers (n = 19, mean 23 cigarettes per day) on the Sternberg memory search task. A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design was used with one between-subject factor, status (heavy, light or non-smoker) and two within-subject factors, condition (12 hours abstinence or ad libitum smoking) x time (pre- or post-cigarette). Heavy smokers in the pre-cigarette abstinent session had significantly slower reaction times, movement times and higher intercepts (a measure of factors contributing to performance other than rate of memory scan) than non-smokers. After smoking these differences were removed. This suggests that rather than improving performance smoking ameliorates a deficit in certain measures of the Sternberg task produced by abstinence. Under ad libitum conditions improvements in performance were attributed to practice. Across all within-subject conditions, there were no significant main effects of smoking status, and this result was consistent with the lack of relationship between measures of saliva continine and expired air carbon monoxide and performance. These data do not support the view that non-abstinent smokers differ from non-smokers in the performance of the Sternberg memory search procedure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.