The effects of cattle sex on carcass characteristics and longissimus muscle palatability1,2

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of sex on carcass traits and cooked beef steak palatability. In Exp. 1, steers (n = 99), heifers (n = 51), and intravaginally spayed heifers (n = 46) were fed a high-energy diet for 161 d. No implants were administered, and heifers were not fed melengestrol acetate to suppress estrus. In Exp. 2, 60 steers and 60 intact heifers from the same ranch source used in Exp. 1 were fed in 2 locations (sites 1 and 2). All management factors were equal across experiments except that intact heifers were fed melengestrol acetate to suppress estrus in Exp. 2. Steers in Exp. 1 were 25 kg heavier (P < 0.01) in HCW than heifers at comparable (P = 0.39) carcass fat thickness. Spayed heifers (Exp. 1) had a 5.7% smaller (P < 0.05) LM area compared with steers and intact heifers, which were similar. In Exp. 2, there was no difference (P = 0.2) in carcass weight, and heifers had greater (P < 0.01) 12th rib fat thickness compared with steers. Calculated yield grades were similar (P = 0.21) among treatments in Exp. 1 and tended (P = 0.08) to be greater for heifers compared with steers in Exp. 2. In Exp. 1, USDA quality grades and marbling scores were lower (P < 0.01) for steers compared with intact and spayed heifers, which were similar. The effects of sex on tenderness were examined at a common level of fat-thickness and marbling by covariate analysis. Steaks from steers, compared with those from nonimplanted, intact heifers, in the 2 experiments combined were: (a) superior (P < 0.05) in 2 of 9 palatability assessments when subcutaneous fat thickness (at the 12th rib) was adjusted to a common level, and (b) superior (P < 0.05) in 6 of 9 palatability assessments when marbling score was adjusted to a common level. In Exp. 1, steaks from nonimplanted steers compared with those from nonimplanted spayed heifers were: (a) superior (P < 0.05) in 0 of 8 palatability assessments when subcutaneous fat thickness (at the 12th rib) was adjusted to a common level, and (b) superior (P < 0.05) in 3 of 8 palatability assessments when marbling score was adjusted to a common level. These findings suggest that sex should be added to the list of antemortem factors contributing to variation in cooked beef steak tenderness. However, more research is needed to precisely identify those factors contributing to the lower tenderness observed for steaks from heifer carcasses.