The effects of castration, preslaughter stress and zeranol implants on beef: Part 2—Cooking properties and flavor of loin steaks from bovine males

Abstract

A total of 144 male crossbred calves were allocated to four castration or implant treatments (unimplanted bulls; unimplanted steers; bulls implanted with zeranol at 100 days of age and reimplanted at intervals of 69, 93 and 56 days thereafter; bulls implanted with zeranol at 168 days of age and reimplanted at intervals of 93 and 56 days thereafter) and two preslaughter shipping treatments (minimum preslaughter stress, with cattle shipped and slaughtered within 4 h of leaving the feedlot pen; normal preslaughter stress, with cattle mixed, trucked 160 km, and slaughtered up to 24 h after leaving the feedlot pen). These cattle were slaughtered and striploin steaks were removed after 6 days of post-mortem aging. Evaluations of these steaks were then conducted using both an experienced laboratory taste panel and a highly trained professional flavor profile panel. Results indicated that: (1) steaks from bulls had higher cooking losses than their counterparts from steers, when minimum preslaughter stress was applied; and required longer cooking times under both preslaughter handling treatments; (2) steaks from unimplanted bulls had greater cooking losses and required longer cooking times than their counterparts from implanted bulls under normal preslaughter stress, but not under minimum preslaughter stress; (3) higher proportions of bull steaks than steer steaks contained inappropriate flavor character notes, under both minimum and normal levels of preslaughter stress; (4) both castration and preslaughter handling affected the intensity and order of appearance of specific flavor character notes; (5) the level of preslaughter stress significantly influenced the detection of specific flavor character notes in steaks from both bulls and steers; (6) steaks from steers under minimum preslaughter stress were rated significantly higher in flavor amplitude than their counterparts from bulls when under normal preslaughter stress, and steaks from steers under minimum preslaughter stress received higher flavor desirability scores than steaks from bulls under both minimum and normal preslaughter stress; (7) zeranol implants influenced the appearance and the order of appearance of specific flavor character notes under both minimum and normal levels of preslaughter stress; (8) both zeranol implants and the length of time animals were implanted appeared to increase the intensity of certain inappropriate character notes, and to decrease the intensity of certain appropriate character notes; (9) steaks from implanted bulls received lower flavor amplitude ratings than their counterparts from unimplanted bulls under normal preslaughter stress, but not under minimum preslaughter stress; (10) the level of preslaughter stress influenced both the appearance and order of appearance of specific flavor character notes in both implanted and unimplanted bull steaks; (11) the intensities of certain flavor character notes were influenced by differences in the level of preslaughter stress in both implanted and unimplanted bull steaks, and higher levels usually resulted in inappropriate character notes being more intense; (12) steaks from bulls in both implant groups received lower flavor amplitude ratings when normal preslaughter stress was applied, clearly indicating the deleterious effect of the combination of zeranol implants and normal preslaughter stress on bull beef flavor; and (13) the deleterious effect of the combination of zeranol implants and normal preslaughter stress on bull beef flavor could not be explaind on the basis of greater production of ‘dark cutting’ beef.