The effects of blur and size on monocular and stereoscopic localization

Abstract

Monocular localization of non-abutting stimuli and stereoscopic localization of the same second-order targets are performed with the same precision (Wilcox, L.M. & Hess, R.F. (1996) Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? Vision Research, 36, 391–399). Further, both tasks show a similar dependence on the scale of the stimulus. Since prior studies used Gaussian-enveloped stimuli, modifications of stimulus scale produced concurrent changes in edge blur. The experiments reported here assess the relative contributions of size and blur to the observed dependence on envelope scale for both monocular localization and stereoacuity. Stereoacuity for first-order targets was found to be an order of magnitude better than stereoacuity for second-order targets and monocular acuity for both first- and second-order targets. Further, while first-order stereopsis was found to depend solely on blur, second-order stereoacuity and monocular acuity were affected by both size and blur. These results suggest that while stereoacuity for first-order stimuli may be determined by a correlative process limited by early additive noise, stereoacuity for second-order stimuli and monocular acuity for non-abutting targets are more likely limited by stimulus-dependent spatial subsampling.