Abstract

Animal vocalizations in natural settings are invariably accompanied by an acoustic background with a complex statistical structure. We have previously demonstrated that neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex of halothane-anesthetized cats depend strongly on the natural background. Here, we study in detail the neuronal responses to the background sounds and their relationships to the responses to the foreground sounds. Natural bird chirps as well as modifications of these chirps were used. The chirps were decomposed into three components: the clean chirps, their echoes, and the background noise. The last two were weaker than the clean chirp by 13 and 29 dB on average respectively. The test stimuli consisted of the full natural stimulus, the three basic components, and their three pairwise combinations. When the level of the background components (echoes and background noise) presented alone was sufficiently loud to evoke neuronal activity, these background components had an unexpectedly strong effect on the responses of the neurons to the main bird chirp. In particular, the responses to the original chirps were more similar on average to the responses evoked by the two background components than to the responses evoked by the clean chirp, both in terms of the evoked spike count and in terms of the temporal pattern of the responses. These results suggest that some of the neurons responded specifically to the acoustic background even when presented together with the substantially louder main chirp, and may imply that neurons in A1 already participate in auditory source segregation.

Highlights

  • 200 wellseparated neurons were recorded from 10 cats at levels corresponding to the middle and high sound levels used in the mapping experiments

  • It appears that the background component had an inordinately large effect on the response of this neuron, considering its low level

  • The aim of this work was to study the difference between the responses to a set of natural stimuli, consisting of bird chirps embedded in their simultaneous natural background, and the responses to the same bird chirps cleaned from that background

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Whereas the representation of simple stimuli such as pure tones or amplitude- or frequency-modulated sounds in primary auditory cortex (A1) of mammals has been described in great detail (Bizley et al, 2005; Joris et al, 2004; Kadia and Wang, 2003; Liang et al, 2002; Moshitch et al, 2006; Nelken and Versnel, 2000; Read et al, 2002; Ricketts et al, 1998; Sutter and Loftus, 2003; Tan et al, 2004; Tian and Rauschecker, 1998; Tomita et al, 2004; Wehr and Zador, 2003), the processing of complex sounds, in particular natural sounds, in A1 is not well understood. In the awake squirrel monkey, Pelleg-Toiba and Wollberg (1991) found that only in 2% of the neurons the responses to species-specific calls and time reversed calls (“llacs”) were mirror image of each other, and only in 34% of the neurons at least one call elicited a response that corresponded to the temporal modulation of the acoustic waveform. They concluded that complex calls are represented by neuronal populations distributed throughout cochleotopic space (and not by call detectors), the responses of many neurons were not related to the acoustic features of the calls.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call