Abstract

The difficulty in teasing apart the effects of biological invasions from those of other anthropogenic perturbations has hampered our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the global biodiversity crisis. The recent elaboration of global-scale maps of cumulative human impacts provides a unique opportunity to assess how the impact of invaders varies among areas exposed to different anthropogenic activities. A recent meta-analysis has shown that the effects of invasive seaweeds on native biota tend to be more negative in relatively pristine than in human-impacted environments. Here, we tested this hypothesis through the experimental removal of the invasive green seaweed, Caulerpa cylindracea, from rocky reefs across the Mediterranean Sea. More specifically, we assessed which out of land-based and sea-based cumulative impact scores was a better predictor of the direction and magnitude of the effects of this seaweed on extant and recovering native assemblages. Approximately 15 months after the start of the experiment, the removal of C. cylindracea from extant assemblages enhanced the cover of canopy-forming macroalgae at relatively pristine sites. This did not, however, result in major changes in total cover or species richness of native assemblages. Preventing C. cylindracea re-invasion of cleared plots at pristine sites promoted the recovery of canopy-forming and encrusting macroalgae and hampered that of algal turfs, ultimately resulting in increased species richness. These effects weakened progressively with increasing levels of land-based human impacts and, indeed, shifted in sign at the upper end of the gradient investigated. Thus, at sites exposed to intense disturbance from land-based human activities, the removal of C. cylindracea fostered the cover of algal turfs and decreased that of encrusting algae, with no net effect on species richness. Our results suggests that competition from C. cylindracea is an important determinant of benthic assemblage diversity in pristine environments, but less so in species-poor assemblages found at sites exposed to intense disturbance from land-based human activities, where either adverse physical factors or lack of propagules may constrain the number of potential native colonizers. Implementing measures to reduce the establishment and spread of C. cylindracea in areas little impacted by land-based human activities should be considered a priority for preserving the biodiversity of Mediterranean shallow rocky reefs.

Highlights

  • Concerns over the potential of invasive species to alter biodiversity, impair ecosystem functioning and cause economic loss have stimulated research on the mechanisms underpinning variations in their impacts on native species and communities (Mack et al, 2000)

  • Five plots were randomly assigned to each of the following four treatments generated by crossing disturbance (2 levels; control versus clearing of the whole assemblage, hereafter referred to as extant and recovering assemblages, respectively) and manipulation of C. cylindracea (2 levels; present versus removed): 1) removal of C. cylindracea from extant assemblages, 2) total clearing of extant assemblages preventing the re-invasion by C. cylindracea, 3) total clearing of extant assemblages but allowing re-invasion by C. cylindracea and 4) controls, assemblages invaded by C. cylindracea

  • The removal of C. cylindracea had no effect on the cover of encrusting algae, turfforming algae and sessile invertebrates (Table 1A), nor on the total cover and species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Concerns over the potential of invasive species to alter biodiversity, impair ecosystem functioning and cause economic loss have stimulated research on the mechanisms underpinning variations in their impacts on native species and communities (Mack et al, 2000). Tamburello et al (2015) have shown, by means of a global meta-analysis, that the effects of non-native seaweeds on native benthic communities tend to shift from negative to neutral or positive along a gradient of increasing cumulative human impact (Halpern et al, 2008), suggesting that the severity of their effects might be greater in relatively pristine than in degraded environments. The impact score developed by Halpern et al (2008) combines a diverse set of anthropogenic drivers, including climate change, land-based and sea-based human impacts. It provides little insight into the nature of the key drivers underpinning variations in the effects of non-native seaweeds on native benthic assemblages. It could be argued that land-based human impacts are more likely to influence the fitness and competitive ability of both native and non-native macroalgal species, as well as the outcome of their interactions, in comparison to sea-based impacts

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call