Abstract

Background: Efalizumab is a humanized IgG 1 mAb against the lymphocyte function antigen-1 (LFA-1) alpha chain, CD11a. Blocking of LFA-1/intercellular adhesion molecule interactions could inhibit asthmatic inflammation by blocking adhesion and activation of LFA-1-positive leukocytes. Objective: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study investigated the effects of efalizumab on allergen-induced airway responsiveness and airway inflammation. Methods: Thirty-five nonsmoking subjects with mild allergic asthma were randomized to receive efalizumab (n = 24) or placebo (n = 11) in 8 weekly subcutaneous doses (0.7 mg/kg conditioning dose followed by 7 weekly doses of 2.0 mg/kg). Allergen challenges were performed at screening and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Samples of sputum (n = 18 subjects) and blood (n = 35 subjects) were collected the day before challenges, and sputum was collected again at 7 and 24 hours after each challenge. Nonparametric tests were used to compare allergen-induced differences between efalizumab and placebo groups. Results: Subjects receiving efalizumab developed headache (48%) and flu syndrome (28%) compared to subjects receiving placebo (0%). After 8 weeks of efalizumab, the maximum late percent fall in FEV 1 (late asthmatic response) was inhibited by 50%, but neither the late response nor the late area under the curve was statistically different than placebo ( P = .098 and .062, respectively). Efalizumab had no effect on the maximum early percent fall in FEV 1 (early asthmatic response) or early area under the curve compared to placebo ( P > .59). Efalizu-mab significantly reduced the postallergen increase in sputum EG2-positive cells and metachromatic cells ( P < .05). No other comparisons were statistically different. Conclusions: Blocking of LFA-1/intercellular adhesion module interactions by efalizumab inhibits the development of allergen-induced cellular inflammatory responses measured in induced sputum and might attenuate the late asthmatic response. Larger studies are needed to confirm this. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;112:331-8.)

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call