Abstract

Facing a population growth rate of 3.2 percent and dwindling per capita land access, many rural communities in Burundi are experimenting with land cooperatives to collectivize risk, share information, reap economies of scale (if any), and build trust between association members. We use unique field data gathered by one author (Almquist) during a one-shot evaluation of a cooperative association operating in three villages in southeastern Burundi. We employ pseudo difference-in-differences logistic regression models to assess the effects of the cooperative on the (1) incidence of reported land conflicts within the last three years, (2) perceived community land inequality, (3) reported acceptability of land inequality, (4) violence toward acquaintances, (5) trust of colleagues, and (6) trust of neighbors. We find no evidence that cooperatives affect the incidence of land conflicts, but do find that residents of cooperative villages exhibit heightened perceptions of, and lower tolerance for, land inequalities; they are less likely to report violence toward acquaintances, but cooperative members are more likely to do so than nonmembers; and nonmember residents of active cooperative towns report less trust toward neighbors. We speculate that one weakness of cooperatives is that they may heighten the risk of violence between members and nonmembers. [JEL codes: D74, H56, O1]

Highlights

  • Burundi is one of the mostly densely populated and highly agrarian countries in Africa

  • By contrast, boasts no similar efforts, despite a 3.2 percent population growth rate that threatens to double the number of mouths to feed in 22 years and raises the likelihood of a relapse into violent conflict

  • The study reported on here leverages a unique dataset gathered in 2011 by one of the authors (Almquist) in the course of a one-shot evaluation of a cooperative association called Plant with Purpose operating in three villages in southern Burundi

Read more

Summary

Results

The fact of being a town that has hosted the cooperative for three years is statistically positively related to perception of land inequalities, and negatively related to the acceptance of those same inequalities It correlates negatively and statistically significantly with reported violence to oneself or one’s acquaintances, and with levels of trust in one’s colleagues. The fact of being a member of a cooperative in a town that has three years of experience hosting the cooperative is positively and statistically significantly correlated with a likelihood of reported violence against oneself or one’s acquaintances, as well as the level of trust in one’s colleagues. In the villages where the cooperative has been operational, members’ probability of reporting great trust in their colleagues exceeds that of nonmembers (and that of members in the village with a nonoperational cooperative), and again the difference in slopes is statistically significant. Members are significantly more likely to have experienced violence against self or acquaintances in the past year (even though violence is generally lower in cooperative-operational villages than in nonoperational ones), and more likely to develop trust in their colleagues than nonmembers

Discussion
This was the case
Hardening of ethnic lines
At all costs
Capturing 65 seats
More than one-in-six
11. Cramer
12. Empirically linked
13. Cognitive dissonance in social psychology
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call