Abstract

The development of executive functions (EF) has been widely investigated and is associated with various domains of expertise, such as academic achievement and sports performance. Multiple factors are assumed to influence the development of EF, among them biological maturation. Currently the effect of biological maturation on EF performance is largely unexplored, in contrast to other domains like physical development or sports performance. Therefore, this study aimed (a) to explore the effect of chronological age on EF performance and (b) to investigate to what extent age-related changes found in EF are affected by biological maturation on both sexes. To this end, EF performance and degree of maturity, indexed by percentage of predicted adult height (%PAH), of 90 adolescents (11–16 years old, 54% males) were measured on three occasions in a time frame of 12 months. A Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach was used to examine the association between chronological age and %PAH and the weighted sum scores for each EF component (i.e., inhibition, planning, working memory, shifting). All models were run separately for both sexes. The males’ results indicated that EF performance improved with age and degree of maturity on all four components. Interaction effects between age and %PAH on inhibition showed that at a younger age, males with a higher %PAH had a lower chance of performing well on inhibition, whereas at later ages, males with a higher %PAH had a higher chance to have a good inhibition performance. For working memory, it seems that there is no maturity effect at a younger age, while at later ages, a disadvantage for later maturing peers compared to on-time and earlier maturing male adolescents emerged. Females showed slightly different results. Here, age positively influenced EF performance, whereas maturity only influenced inhibition. Interaction effects emerged for working memory only, with opposite results from the males. At younger ages, females with lower %PAH values seem to be scoring higher, whereas at later ages, no maturity effect is observed. This study is one of the first to investigate the effect of biological maturation on EF performance, and shows that distinct components of EF are influenced by maturational status, although the effects are different in both sexes. Further research is warranted to unravel the implications for maturation-driven effects on EF that might significantly affect domains of human functioning like academic achievement and social development.

Highlights

  • Executive functions (EF) are cognitive processes required for the behavioral control of numerous daily-life tasks and are crucial for cognitive, social, and psychological development (Diamond, 2013)

  • When BMI cut-offs were used on the first test occasion, 14 participants were classified as underweight (15.6%), 64 as normal-weight (71.1%), seven as overweight (7.8%) and no adolescents were classified as obese

  • The current study explored the association of age, biological maturation and sex on EF development during adolescence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Executive functions (EF) are cognitive processes required for the behavioral control of numerous daily-life tasks and are crucial for cognitive, social, and psychological development (Diamond, 2013). It is known that there is considerable inter-individual variation in the rate and timing of biological maturation, which makes chronological age an estimate of development at best (Lloyd et al, 2014) This is especially true for adolescence, which is accompanied with many biological within-person changes (Grumbach and Styne, 1998). In contrast to the EF research field, studies on physical development in the sports context have widely investigated and applied the impact of biological maturation (Cumming et al, 2017) These studies generally indicate an advantage for early maturing adolescents compared to late maturing adolescents on sports performance during these pubertal phases due to their advanced growth and physical fitness level (Meylan et al, 2010; Rommers et al, 2019). Biological maturation could have a similar influence on EF and EF development (Juraska and Willing, 2017; Chaku and Hoyt, 2019; Stumper et al, 2020), and can affect academic performance, social development or even risk behavior (Magnusson et al, 1985; Baxter-Jones et al, 2005; Koerselman and Pekkarinen, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.