Abstract

RationaleFalse face recognition rates are sometimes higher when faces are learned while under the influence of alcohol. Alcohol myopia theory (AMT) proposes that acute alcohol intoxication during face learning causes people to attend to only the most salient features of a face, impairing the encoding of less salient facial features. Yet, there is currently no direct evidence to support this claim.ObjectivesOur objective was to test whether acute alcohol intoxication impairs face learning by causing subjects to attend to a salient (i.e., distinctive) facial feature over other facial features, as per AMT.MethodsWe employed a balanced placebo design (N = 100). Subjects in the alcohol group were dosed to achieve a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.06 %, whereas the no alcohol group consumed tonic water. Alcohol expectancy was controlled. Subjects studied faces with or without a distinctive feature (e.g., scar, piercing). An old-new recognition test followed. Some of the test faces were “old” (i.e., previously studied), and some were “new” (i.e., not previously studied). We varied whether the new test faces had a previously studied distinctive feature versus other familiar characteristics.ResultsIntoxicated and sober recognition accuracy was comparable, but subjects in the alcohol group made more positive identifications overall compared to the no alcohol group.ConclusionsThe results are not in keeping with AMT. Rather, a more general cognitive mechanism appears to underlie false face recognition in intoxicated subjects. Specifically, acute alcohol intoxication during face learning results in more liberal choosing, perhaps because of an increased reliance on familiarity.

Highlights

  • This study investigates the influence of acute alcohol intoxication on face recognition and in particular, the influence of intoxication on attention during encoding

  • Breathalyzer readings taken 30 min after the beginning of beverage consumption indicated that all subjects in the no alcohol group had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.00 %, while the BAC of subjects in alcohol group was significantly higher (M BAC = 0.06 %, 95 % CI [.05, .06], SD = 0.02, range 0.02–0.09 %), t(54) = 24.94, p

  • Our results indicate that subjects responded more liberally to distinctive faces, but, in accordance with the H-S model, recognized distinctive faces more accurately than nondistinctive faces

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Our objective was to test whether acute alcohol intoxication impairs face learning by causing subjects to attend to a salient (i.e., distinctive) facial feature over other facial features, as per AMT

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call