Abstract

BackgroundA double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects.MethodsTwenty-one female subjects and 21 male subjects participated. All subjects performed drop landing task (a landing without a subsequent jump) and drop vertical jump task (a landing with a subsequent jump). The subjects landed from a 30-cm height. In drop vertical jump, the subjects also performed a maximum vertical jump immediately after landing. The knee abduction angle and moment were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. A two-way analysis of variance (task × time) was performed to examine the effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase in female and male subjects. Another two-way analysis of variance (task × sex) was performed to compare peak knee abduction angles and moments.ResultsIn female subjects, the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing, as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial contact (P < 0.05). Significant task-dependent effects in the peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.001) and the abduction moment (P = 0.029) were detected. The peak knee abduction angle and the abduction moment were greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing.ConclusionsSubsequent jumps cause greater knee abduction during the early landing phase only in female subjects. This finding may relate to the sex discrepancy in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Additionally, the presence of a subsequent jump significantly increases the peak knee abduction angle and the peak knee abduction moment during landings. Therefore, compared with a landing task without a subsequent jump (drop landing), a landing task with a subsequent jump (drop vertical jump) may be advantageous for screening for knee abduction control, especially in female athletes.

Highlights

  • A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction

  • The results showed that the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during Drop vertical jump (DVJ), as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial ground contact (IC), but only in female subjects

  • Cadaveric simulation studies suggest that a knee abduction load with an anterior tibial shear force during the early landing phase plays a crucial role in Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury [13, 26,27,28]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects. Female athletes are at a higher risk of a non-contact ACL injury than male athletes [4]. ACL injuries were believed to occur immediately after ground contact [11,12,13], and one study suggested that a rapid increase in the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase was a mechanism behind ACL injury [11]. Evaluating knee abduction control during the early landing phase as well as the peak knee abduction angle and the knee abduction moment during landing is important

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call