Abstract

In this study, we investigated antiparkinsonian activity of the novel, highly selective dopamine D(2) receptor agonist sumanirole compared with two clinically effective dopaminergic therapies in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) primate model of Parkinson's disease. Squirrel monkeys were rendered parkinsonian by chronic administration of MPTP and subsequently dosed with vehicle, L-DOPA plus carbidopa (L-DOPA), ropinirole, or sumanirole over a duration of 8 weeks. Antiparkinsonian effects measured with a parkinsonian primate rating scale (PPRS) showed that sumanirole elicited improved functional outcome compared with vehicle. The dopamine D2/D3 agonist ropinirole improved behavioral outcome similar to sumanirole, whereas L-DOPA treatment yielded the most significant symptomatic improvement. The relative rank of therapies that elicited normalization of PPRS was L-DOPA > sumanirole; ropinirole did not normalize PPRS in any of the treated monkeys. Dyskinesias were present with L-DOPA treatment but were not observed in sumanirole-, ropinirole-, or placebo-treated primates. Pathologically, all MPTP-treated animals displayed neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and reactive astrocytosis. Neurons immunoreactive with antibodies to the nuclear transcription factor DeltaFosB were most significantly increased in the striatum of L-DOPA-treated monkeys. These results suggest that sumanirole can exert antiparkinsonian effects similar to L-DOPA without the behavioral and morphological consequences of the latter.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.