Abstract

BackgroundMechanical heart valve replacement has an inherent risk of thromboembolic events (TEs). Current guidelines recommend an international normalized ratio (INR) of at least 2.5 after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a low INR (2.0–2.5) on thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical MVR on warfarin therapy.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent mechanical MVR were enrolled in this study. The end points of this study were defined as TEs (valve thrombosis, transient ischemic attack, stroke) and bleeding (all minor and major bleeding) complications. Patients were followed up for a mean of 39.6 months and the mean INR of the patients was calculated. After data collection, patients were divided into 3 groups according to their mean INR, as follows: group 1 (n = 34), INR <2.0; group 2 (n = 49), INR 2.0–2.5; and group 3 (n = 52), INR >2.5.ResultsA total of 22 events (10 [7.4%] thromboembolic and 12 [8.8%] bleeding events) occurred in the follow-up period. The mean INR was an independent risk factor for the development of TEs. Mean INR and neurological dysfunction were independent risk factors for the development of bleeding events. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the log mean INR and all bleeding events, and a negative correlation was found between the log mean INR and all TEs. The total number of events was significantly lower in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.036).ConclusionsThis study showed that a target INRs of 2.0–2.5 are acceptable for preventing TEs and safe in terms of bleeding complications in patients with mechanical MVR.

Highlights

  • Mechanical heart valve replacement has an inherent risk of thromboembolic events (TEs)

  • This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a low international normalized ratio (INR) (2.0–2.5) on thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) on warfarin therapy

  • We found that the mean INR was significantly lower in patients with TEs than in patients without TEs (P = 0.022) and the other parameters were similar among the groups (Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mechanical heart valve replacement has an inherent risk of thromboembolic events (TEs). Lifelong oral anticoagulation is recommended for all patients with mechanical heart valves irrespective of valve type or date of introduction and is essential for the prevention of thromboembolic events (TEs) [1,2]. Previous studies suggest that a low INR is preferable and safe for mechanical heart valves, the effect of a low INR in patients with mechanical MVR alone has not been studied [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a low INR (2.0–2.5) on thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical MVR on warfarin therapy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call