Abstract
Background. Use of cavity cleanser is important before restoration the teeth to clean debris, residue of prepared dentine, blood, bacteria, collagen denaturized by teeth preparation. Nowadays, the cavity cleanser that people used still having shortcoming, one of which is the lack of ability to clean the root canal of the smear layer. Purpose. The purpose of this study examines the difference of cavity cleaner between saponin of mangoosteen peel (GarciniaMangostana L.) and chlorhexidinegluconate 2%. Method. Eighteen upper first premolar divided into 3 groups, each of them consist three tooth. Forming the preparation tooth cavity then group 1 using aquadest for control group, group 2 using chlorhexidinegluconate 2%, and group 3 using saponin of mangoosteen peel (GarciniaMangostana L.). For rating cleanliness of the tooth cavity using a scale of cleanliness conducted under Scanning Electron Microscope. Result. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in One-Way ANOVA parametric test andpos hoc test between chlorhexidinegluconate 2 % and saponin of mangoosteen peel to the cleanliness of the tooth cavity. Conclusion.According to the result of the study, it can be concluded that saponin of mangoosteen peel (GarciniaMangostana L.) less effective for cleaning the tooth cavity than chlorhexidinegluconate 2%.
Highlights
Dental cavity preparation is a restoration procedure to remove infected dentin and make space for the restoration material
In the distilled water cavity cleanser, an average rating of 0.2%, chlorhexidine gluconate 2% obtained an average rating of 2.94%, and mangosteen skin extract saponins obtained an average rating of 1,003%
The data homogeneity analysis was tested and the significance value of 0272 was obtained which was greater than 0.05 (p> 0.05). These results indicated that the data variant was homogeneous it fulfilled the requirements for continued analysis by using One-Way ANOVA parametric test
Summary
Dental cavity preparation is a restoration procedure to remove infected dentin and make space for the restoration material. Purpose: The purpose of this study examines the difference of cavity cleaner between saponin of mangosteen peel (Garcinia Mangostana L.) and chlorhexidine gluconate 2%. Forming the preparation tooth cavity group 1 using aquadest for control group, group 2 using chlorhexidine gluconate 2%, and group 3 using saponin of mangosteen peel (Garcinia Mangostana L.). Results: There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in One-Way ANOVA parametric test and pos hoc test between chlorhexidine gluconate 2 % and saponin of mangosteen peel to the cleanliness of the tooth cavity. Conclusion: According to the result of the study, it can be concluded that saponin of mangosteen peel (Garcinia Mangostana L.) less effective for cleaning the tooth cavity than chlorhexidine gluconate 2%
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
