The effectiveness of the routine clinic visit in the follow-up of breast cancer patients: Analysis of a defined patient cohort

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the proportion of patients with relapse or a contralateral breast tumour who are diagnosed as a consequence of regular follow-up in a specialist breast clinic after breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer. A retrospective review was undertaken of 490 consecutive patients entered into a randomized clinical trial of radiotherapy fractionation at a single institution. As part of the trial, patients were reviewed in a multidisciplinary breast clinic 3-monthly for the first 3 years, 6-monthly between 3 and 5 years and annually thereafter, with biennial mammography. For this study, information was retrieved from hospital records to ascertain: (a) whether patients were symptomatic at the time of relapse or contralateral breast tumour; and (b) whether they presented at a scheduled appointment or brought their appointment dates forward. The subsequent management of patients with relapse was reviewed to determine whether or not this may have been influenced favourably by a policy of regular follow-up. Twenty-one (44%) of the 48 patients with locoregional relapse were asymptomatic. Of these, 17 were detected by clinical examination (that is, directly as a result of a routine clinic attendance), while four were detected by routine mammography. Ten of the 17 patients diagnosed by clinical examination had successful surgery for locoregional relapse and all have remained disease free. Five of 17 developed distant metastases within 6 months and two others had skin nodules on the breast excised. Only three of the 67 patients with distant relapses were asymptomatic. Two of the 11 patients with contralateral breast tumours were asymptomatic and were diagnosed on routine mammography. The benefits and cost-effectiveness of less rigid approaches to follow-up of breast cancer patients needs to be evaluated in large prospective randomized trials.