The effectiveness of surgical treatment of lung cancer in Polish academic and nonacademic centers.

Abstract

The theoretical advantage of academic hospitals over nonacademic are: more qualified surgeons, adequate diagnostic facilities and infrastructure, including intensive care units. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical lung cancer treatment in academic (ACA) and nonacademic (non-ACA) centers. This was a retrospective analysis of data from 31,777 patients surgically-treated for lung cancer during the period from 2007 to 2020 in 9 ACA and 21 non-ACA centers. The analysis considered the clinical data of patients, the effectiveness of preoperative diagnostics, the type of procedures performed, the complications, the postoperative mortality and the long-term survival. The median number of anatomical lung resection procedures was 1,218 for ACA and 550 for non-ACA centers. In the ACA group, resection using the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) technique was performed significantly more often than in the non-ACA group (23.6% vs. 14.2%, P<0.001). The pN feature analysis showed significantly lower proportions of pNX (9.2%) in the ACA group than those in the non-ACA group (17.1%) (P<0.001). The rates of postoperative complications in the ACA and non-ACA groups were 30.7% and 33.8%, respectively (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in 5-year survival between the ACA and non-ACA groups (56% and 56%, respectively) (P=0.2). The present study showed that ACA centers are characterized by better preoperative diagnostics, a higher percentage of VATS lobectomies, a lower percentage of postoperative complications and a shorter hospitalization period than non-ACA centers, but there was no impact on 5-year survival.