Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify">The development of the revolution era 4.0 which increasingly rapidly demands the wider community to have the ability to think creatively mathematically. One effort to improve the ability to think creatively is through quality education. Quality education can be improved through to train thinking using the right learning model. This study aims to see which results are more effective in improving students' thinking skills between the two learning models applied. The two models are Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models. This research method uses quasi experimental method with a posttest only control test design not control group. This study uses two group subjects with two experimental classes. The analysis of the data used the hypothesis testing of the non-correlated 2-sample t-test. Based on the research results obtained Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models have a better effect on students' creative thinking abilities compared to Problem Based Learning (PBL) models.</p>
Highlights
The 21st century is closely related to the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 which requires people to have the ability to think more creatively and be able to accept rapid technological developments
Based on the rules of students' mathematical creative thinking ability through the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model the process begins by analyzing the questions given by the teacher and gathering facts from various sources
As an increasing students' mathematical creative thinking abilities in the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) model it refers to the grouping stage of students who are followed up by the treatment given by the teacher (Pahrudin et al, 2019)
Summary
The 21st century is closely related to the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 which requires people to have the ability to think more creatively and be able to accept rapid technological developments. The ability to think creatively can be improved for the better. Improving the quality of education will affect one's thinking ability. To measure the mathematical creative thinking skills there are several indicators that must be met, such as original thinking, thinking in detail, thinking fluently, thinking flexibly(Huang et al, 2017; Sriwongchai, 2015; Tanujaya, 2016).This is provide by the comparative data of Indonesian students to international students in terms of the cognitive process domain in the 2018 International Student Assessment Program (PISA) released by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
