Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Powtoon in teaching writing to visual students; to assess the effectiveness of Powtoon in teaching writing to auditory students; to assess the effectiveness of Renderforest in teaching writing to visual students; to assess the effectiveness of Renderforest in teaching writing to auditory students; to show the difference between the effectiveness of Powtoon and Renderforest in teaching writing to visual students; to show the difference between the effectiveness of Powtoon and Renderforest in teaching writing to auditory students; and to explain the relationship between interactive multimedia-based learning and students’ learning styles in teaching writing. This study used experimental research with 2x2 factorial designs. The population were the tenth-grade students at MAN 2 Model Medan with the samples were 74 students of experimental I and II that categorized into visual and auditory learning styles. The result indicated that (1) Powtoon was effective in teaching writing to visual students; (2) Powtoon was effective in teaching writing to auditory students; (3) Renderforest was effective in teaching writing to visual students; (4) Renderforest was effective in teaching writing to auditory students; (5) Powtoon and Renderforest were equally effective in teaching writing to visual students; (6) Powtoon and Renderforest were equally effective in teaching writing to auditory students; and (7) Interactive multimedia were effective in teaching writing to visual and auditory students. Keywords: Powtoon, Renderforest, Teaching Writing, Learning Styles

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call