Abstract

The Housing Stock Renovation Program in Moscow, endorsed in 2017, caused a large number of public and academic debates on its quality and potential efficiency as well as (in more general terms) on possible methods of estimating the effectiveness of government and municipal programs implementation in the Russian Federation. The relevance of these discussions is predicated, among other things, on huge funds actually injected by the Russian government (especially on the national and subnational levels) into various links of the national development and construction industry. More than 1.74 trillion rubles were allocated from the Moscow budget alone for the financing of various construction programs in 2018-2020. Inquiring into the existing and prospective methods of decision-making in the process of development, approval, execution and assessment of the housing stock renovation program efficiency as well as suggesting practical recommendations in the given sphere were the main goals of the research undertaken by the author. Using the comparative analysis of several earlier completed government programs versus similar ones or the recently adopted Moscow renovation program, their goals and objectives, the author identifies, pigeonholes and compares their basic parameters and targets which were or weren’t actually attained. The undertaken research brings the author to the conclusion about the absence in the modern research, economic or practical circulation of any scientifically grounded methodology for ensuring a synchronous integrated real estate development and preset mechanisms of state participation in the investment and construction process, based, among other things, on bringing the target parameters of public (municipal programs) in conformity with their economic parameters.

Highlights

  • Launching the practical implementation of a rather large-scale program of rundown and failing housing renovation in Moscow, which in the initial four years alone, including the starting year 2017, requires 400 billion rubles, with 1.74 trillion rubles set aside in the Moscow budget of 2018-2020 for the financing of construction programs, gives rise to a legitimate concern about the economic efficiency of the planned outlay

  • The scale and complexity of the housing stock renovation problem in the Russian Federation have long been rousing the interest of domestic economists

  • We propose the development of relevant methods for assessing the effectiveness of new government programs for demolition of failing, rundown or just morally outdated housing stock in the Russian Federation, based on comparative analysis of the goals, objectives and actual results of implementing several already completed national and subnational programs having comparable parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Launching the practical implementation of a rather large-scale program of rundown and failing housing renovation in Moscow, which in the initial four years alone, including the starting year 2017, requires 400 billion rubles, with 1.74 trillion rubles set aside in the Moscow budget of 2018-2020 for the financing of construction programs, gives rise to a legitimate concern about the economic efficiency of the planned outlay. This is not the only problem, as we further show. Ponyavina and V.I, Zakharova (Voronezh region – [9])

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call