The effectiveness of eHealth interventions on female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesiseHealth interventions represent a promising novel strategy in pelvic floor management for women. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of eHealth interventions among women with or at risk of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) has not been adequately discussed to date. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in preventing and treating PFD among women.MethodsEleven electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until August 28, 2021.ResultsTwenty-four RCTs were included in this meta-analysis that included 3691 women. The meta-analysis showed that eHealth interventions were not only vital for preventing PFD (pregnant women: pooled OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.45, p < 0.001; postnatal women: pooled OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.60, p = 0.005), but also for reducing the severity of PFD (pooled SMD = -0.63, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.06, p = 0.031). In addition, compared with traditional care, eHealth interventions showed significant positive effects on several outcome indicators, including quality of life (pooled SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.80, p = 0.002), pelvic floor type I muscle strength (pooled OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.30 to 2.82, p = 0.001), pelvic floor type II muscle strength (pooled OR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.38 to 3.01, p < 0.001), sexual function (pooled SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.73, p < 0.001), satisfaction (pooled OR = 3.93, 95% CI: 2.73 to 5.66, p < 0.001), and self-efficacy (pooled SMD = 2.62, 95% CI: 2.12 to 3.13, p < 0.001).ConclusionseHealth interventions are an effective emerging treatment and preventive modality for female PFD. Higher quality, larger scale, and strictly designed RCTs are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of eHealth interventions on female pelvic floor management.