Abstract

Different levels of sugar replacers (inulin or Stevianna and Stevianna) are used in two muffin batter recipes differing in sugar:flour ratios. The properties of these sugar replacers are linked to differences in batter viscosity, starch gelatinization, and in vitro predictive glycemic response of batters. The replacement of sugar with Stevianna has no significant effect on the viscosity of the batter or the starch gelatinization. Replacement of 50% or more of the sugar with inulin increased batter viscosity. The starch gelatinization properties were altered with the incorporation of inulin. Batters incorporating Stevianna and cocoa powder has significantly different viscosity compared to the batters incorporating Stevianna without cocoa powder. In vitro starch hydrolysis of the batters illustrate that the inclusion of inulin or Stevianna significantly reduce the rate and extent of carbohydrate hydrolysis doing digestion.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.