Abstract

Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity progressively diminish with increasing viewing eccentricity. Here we evaluated how visual enumeration is affected by visual eccentricity, and whether subitizing capacity, the accurate enumeration of a small number (∼3) of items, decreases with more eccentric viewing. Participants enumerated gratings whose (1) stimulus size was constant across eccentricity, and (2) whose stimulus size scaled by a cortical magnification factor across eccentricity. While we found that enumeration accuracy and precision decreased with increasing eccentricity, cortical magnification scaling of size neutralized the deleterious effects of increasing eccentricity. We found that size scaling did not affect subitizing capacities, which were nearly constant across all eccentricities. We also found that size scaling modulated the variation coefficients, a normalized metric of enumeration precision, defined as the standard deviation divided by the mean response. Our results show that the inaccuracy and imprecision associated with increasing viewing eccentricity is due to limitations in spatial resolution. Moreover, our results also support the notion that the precise number system is restricted to small numerosities (represented by the subitizing limit), while the approximate number system extends across both small and large numerosities (indexed by variation coefficients) at large eccentricities.

Highlights

  • Our visual abilities depend on viewing eccentricity

  • For stimuli that were scaled in size in Experiment 2, enumeration functions were nearly identical across eccentricities, suggesting that visual enumeration in the periphery is principally limited by spatial resolution

  • The magnitudes of the variation coefficient did not vary with viewing eccentricity. These data suggest that (1) subitizing capacity is robust to the effects of viewing eccentricity, and (2) increasing eccentricity decreases enumeration accuracy and precision, but that (3) scaling stimulus size with eccentricity recovers the loss in enumeration performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our visual abilities depend on viewing eccentricity. Visual resolution is high for objects shown at the fovea, but falls progressively in the periphery [1,2]. Visual crowding (e.g., [10]) and slower reading speed [11,12,13] in the periphery suggest that processing of multiple elements might be poor with eccentric viewing. We investigated how the apprehension of multiple elements via visual enumeration changes in viewing eccentricity. We evaluated whether viewing eccentricity changes ‘‘subitization’’, the rapid apprehension of small number up to 4 items [14]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.