Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ultrasound on threshold to pain produced by a pressure dolorimeter. Twenty healthy, pain-free subjects (12 men, 8 women) who were naive to ultrasound received five minutes of continuous 1.1 MHz ultrasound at 1.0 W/cm2 on the dorsal aspect of one forearm. The other arm acted as the control and received sham ultrasound. A pressure dolorimeter was used to measure pain threshold on the treated area and on an untreated area of both arms, before and after the ultrasound. A three-way ANOVA revealed an interaction among arm (control versus experimental), site (treated versus untreated) and time (before versus after treatment). Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in pain threshold from before (mean = 1.53 kg/cm2, SE = 0.08) to after (1.93 ± 0.12 kg/cm2) treatment only on the dorsal aspect of the experimental arm. There were no changes in pain threshold on the treated site of the control arm (1.49 ± 0.07 − 1.56 ± 0.08 kg/cm2) or on the untreated site on the experimental (1.95 ± 0.12 − 1.96 ± 0.13 kg/cm2) or control (1.95±0.13 − 1.94±0.13 kg/cm2) arm. It is concluded that, in healthy subjects, continuous ultrasound can raise the threshold of pressure-induced pain. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ultrasound on threshold to pain produced by a pressure dolorimeter. Twenty healthy, pain-free subjects (12 men, 8 women) who were naive to ultrasound received five minutes of continuous 1.1 MHz ultrasound at 1.0 W/cm2 on the dorsal aspect of one forearm. The other arm acted as the control and received sham ultrasound. A pressure dolorimeter was used to measure pain threshold on the treated area and on an untreated area of both arms, before and after the ultrasound. A three-way ANOVA revealed an interaction among arm (control versus experimental), site (treated versus untreated) and time (before versus after treatment). Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in pain threshold from before (mean = 1.53 kg/cm2, SE = 0.08) to after (1.93 ± 0.12 kg/cm2) treatment only on the dorsal aspect of the experimental arm. There were no changes in pain threshold on the treated site of the control arm (1.49 ± 0.07 − 1.56 ± 0.08 kg/cm2) or on the untreated site on the experimental (1.95 ± 0.12 − 1.96 ± 0.13 kg/cm2) or control (1.95±0.13 − 1.94±0.13 kg/cm2) arm. It is concluded that, in healthy subjects, continuous ultrasound can raise the threshold of pressure-induced pain.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.