Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess whether training in miscue analysis would influence teachers’ attitudes toward oral reading miscues. The investigator hypothesized that teachers would be more aware of students’ strengths after having been trained in miscue analysis. Graduate students enrolled in a diagnostic and remedial reading course were given a pretest during the first class session. The pretest consisted of listening to a taped sample of oral reading and then writing a description of the student's reading ability. Approximately six weeks later, after having extensively worked through a commercial program on miscue analysis, the same taped sample was used as a posttest. The teachers’ written comments were classified as (1) descriptive comments; (2) negative inferences (those which alluded to the reader's weaknesses); and (3) positive inferences (those which alluded to the reader's strengths). Statistical analysis revealed that significantly more positive inferences were made after misc...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.