Abstract
Fundamental skills are obtained through physical education learning. Students can master one particular sport that is useful in everyday life. Elementary school students aged 6-12 years like to play or have fun in activities. Teachers are expected to design structured games that provide benefits for children's kinesthetic development. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between TG and Drill that affects the fundamental skills (run, jump, overhand throw and catch) in elementary school. The method used in this research is experimental treatment by level 2 x 2 with a sample of 40 students. Data on the results of fundamental skills were obtained from TGMD-2. The data analysis technique was a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then continued with the t- Dunnet test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The results of this study indicate that students who learn with the TG model (A1) are higher than the drill model (A2) with a t<sub>0</sub> value of 2.243> t<sub>tab</sub> 1.684. There is an interaction effect between physical education learning methods and motor ability tests on students' fundamental skills (running, jump, overhand throw and catch) with a value of F<sub>0</sub> 12.835> F<sub>tab</sub> 4.08. The fundamental skills of students taught by the TG model (A1B1) were higher than practice (A1B2) for high motor ability tests with a t<sub>0</sub> value of 5.448 > t<sub>tab</sub> 1.684. The fundamental skills of students taught by the TG model (A1B2) are lower than a drill (A2B2) for low motor ability tests with a t<sub>0</sub> value of 1.886 > t<sub>tab</sub> 1.684. The study concludes that TG has effects on improving students' fundamental skills for high motor skills. Meanwhile, drill has effects on improving students' fundamental skills for low motor skills. The findings of this study also state that traditional games can be used as a physical education learning model because there are elements of physical movement and building cooperation between students.
Highlights
Physical education is learning that can optimize and develop talents in students because there are elements of psychomotor, cognitive, and affective and foundational for a child’s development [1]
The third answer is that there is a difference between the traditional game and drill learning models on fundamental skills for students who have high motor abilities
The fourth answer is that there is a difference between the traditional game and drill learning models on fundamental skills for students who have low motor abilities
Summary
Physical education is learning that can optimize and develop talents in students because there are elements of psychomotor, cognitive, and affective and foundational for a child’s development (movement education, cognitive growth, socializing functions, emotional development) [1]. Teacher’s lack of knowledge to organize systematic physical education learning can result in a lack of opportunities for students to be active. Educational policies and teachers’ lack of training were the primary restrictions related to promoting opportunities for children to learn motor skills [3]. It is hoped that the fundamental skills acquired through physical education learning will allow students to master a particular sport and be useful for carrying out physical activities in everyday life. Physical education has allowed us to identify discourses they drew on in their everyday practice [5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
