Abstract

The studies concerning the effect of the times and the methods of budding on the growth of young cherry trees were conducted in the years 1997-2000 at Felin Experimental Farm of Lublin Agricultural University. The objects of investigations were the young cherry trees obtained as a result of budding of mahaleb cherry (<i>Prunus mahaleb</i> L.) and sweet cherry (<i>Prunus avium</i> L.) seedlings in the way by the chip budding-15<sup>th</sup> July and T-budding-on the 15<sup>th</sup> July and the 1<sup>st</sup> September. The used terms and budding methods did not affect the bud taking and the quality of cherry trees during three years studies. Chip budding of the sweet cherry on the 15<sup>th</sup> July was the most effective way of this seedling budding. Late budding-on the 1<sup>st</sup> September-did not change the efficiency of the nursery only in case of mahaleb cherry. The highest number-33 000 of the young trees, average per 1 ha was got as a result of the chip and "T" mahaleb cherry budding on the 1<sup>st</sup> September.

Highlights

  • Summary The studies concerning the effect of the times and the methods of budding on the growth of young cherry trees were conducted in the years 1997-2000 at Felin Experimental Farm of Lublin Agricultural University

  • The objects of investigations were the young cherry trees obtained as a result of budding of mahaleb cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) seedlings in the way by the chip budding-15thJuly and T-budding-on the 15thJuly and the 1st September

  • Late budding-on the 1st September-did not change the efficiency of the nursery only in case of mahaleb cherry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wp3yw terminów i sposobów okulizacji na jakoœæ okulantów i wydajnoœæ szkó3ki wiœni odmiany '£utówka' Celem badañ by3o okreœlenie wp3ywu terminów i metod okulizacji na przyjmowanie siê oczek odmiany '£utówka', jakoœæ drzewek oraz wydajnoœæ szkó3ki wiœni. W 2000 roku siewki czereœni ptasiej okulizowane 15 lipca na przystawkê mia3y istotnie wiêkszy procent przyjêtych oczek (81,0%) od podk3adek oczkowanych tym samym sposobem 1wrzeœnia (53,2%).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.