Abstract

Sperm morphology and morphometry are important parameters in predicting fertility. Sperm are considered to be normal if the shape and size of the head, midpiece and tail fall within the classification for a given species. It is important to select the appropriate technique for staining the semen of a given species, because, as many authors have pointed out, some methods work well for one species but are not suitable for analysing another. The aim of the study was to assess the morphometric parameters of boar sperm following the use of different staining techniques and to verify the hypothesis that the staining technique affects the morphometric parameters of sperm. The staining method was found to significantly affect the dimensions of the boar sperm head. The semen stained by the SpermBlue technique had the closest morphometric sperm head parameters to those of the unstained sperm, so this technique, rather than the routinely used eosin and gentian complex, should be the leading technique in the evaluation of boar sperm morphometry. Silver nitrate staining reveals the structure of the sperm in the most detail; this method can be considered universal, and can be used independently or to supplement routine diagnostics. As the staining technique should interfere as little as possible with the structure of the sperm, while revealing its morphology in as much detail as possible, it is crucial to establish the natural dimensions of the unstained sperm head before determining the optimal technique and its reference values. The recommended or most commonly-used techniques are not always the best options for the staining and analysis of sperm of a given species.

Highlights

  • The aim of the study was to assess the morphometric parameters of boar sperm after using various staining techniques and to verify the hypothesis that the staining technique affects the morphometric parameters of sperm head

  • The significance of the role of sperm morphometry is evidenced by the increasing number of publications describing research carried out all over the world and on various species

  • For example the relationship between sperm morphometry and fertility in humans has been described by McAlister [34], and Maree et al [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A precise diagnosis of ejaculates is necessary to predict male fertility, in both humans and animals, and is important in optimizing and maximizing their reproductive ability for natural. The effect of the staining technique on morphological and morphometric parameters of boar sperm conception as well as in assisted reproduction techniques (ART).[1] While other basic semen parameters i.e. motility and total sperm count, are important in predicting fertility, the morphological structure of spermatozoa seems to be the most significant factor, especially for natural conception and artificial insemination.[2,3,4,5,6] It has been shown that spermatozoa with abnormal morphology are not able to reach the oocyte.[7] spermatozoa with normal motility but with head defects are incapable of fertilization.[8]. A complete morphological analysis of the male gamete should clearly indicate its fertilization capacity.[12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call