Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the conditions of the application of risk management for commercial banks in Indonesia and to determine the effect of the application of risk management on banking stock price returns based on model 1, model 2, model 3 and determine the best model for stock price return estimation. In measuring the level of risk management implementation in banking, two approaches are used, namely trend analysis and empirical analysis. The following conclusions can be drawn: (1) In model 1, trends The movement of the NETIM variable in one year from period one (March) to period four (December) always goes up and down at the beginning of the year. next. The NONIM variable, the movement in the quarterly period at the beginning tends to be flat, starting to rise in the December 2016 period, while the movement from year to year is not very volatile. (2) In model 2, the trend of the movement of the AVERAGE variable during the 2016-2019 period tends to increase as indicated by the trend line . (3) In model 3, trends The movement of the PRIN1 and PRIN2 variables from year to year during the study period seems to fluctuate (4) Based on the results of the comparison of the four regression estimation models, it can be concluded that the first model is the best model in explain the variation of the movement of the return variable.

Highlights

  • The principles of bank risk management or risk management applied in banking in Indonesia are directed by the Indonesian banking regulator in accordance with the recommendations issued by the Bank for International Settlements (Juwenda, 2014)

  • The aim of this research was to determine the conditions of the application of risk management for commercial banks in Indonesia and to determine the effect of the application of risk management on banking stock price returns based on model 1, model 2, model 3 and determine the best model for stock price return estimation

  • (2) In model 2, the trend of the movement of the AVERAGE variable during the 2016-2019 period tends to increase as indicated by the trend line . (3) In model 3, trends The movement of the PRIN1 and PRIN2 variables from year to year during the study period seems to fluctuate (4) Based on the results of the comparison of the four regression estimation models, it can be concluded that the first model is the best model in explain the variation of the movement of the return variable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The principles of bank risk management or risk management applied in banking in Indonesia are directed by the Indonesian banking regulator in accordance with the recommendations issued by the Bank for International Settlements (Juwenda, 2014). Risk control can be done by improving the quality of risk management implementation. Bank Indonesia as the banking regulator in Indonesia on May 19, 2003 issued Bank Indonesia Regulation number 5/8/PBI/2003 which was amended by PBI No 11/25/PBI/2009 on July 1, 2009 and amended into Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 18/POJK.03/206 concerning the Implementation of Risk Management for Commercial Banks. With the implementation of good risk management, it is expected to improve banking performance and reduce potential losses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.