Abstract

Demand-side housing subsidy schemes have been widely adopted in many countries to improve housing affordability, but quantitative investigations of the policy effect are still rare. This study evaluates the effect of the Housing Provident Fund (HPF), the largest demand-side housing subsidy scheme in the world and under hot debate, on housing affordability in mainland China. We construct a comprehensive housing affordability (CHA) indicator by considering both down payments and monthly payments to reveal the potential pass-through effect. Taking 2020 as an example, we find that the HPF increased housing affordability by 50.54% on average when assuming that down payment affordability (DPA) and monthly payment affordability (MPA) are equally important. The subsidized interest rate and withdrawn balance can compensate for the increased HPF loans transferred from the lower required down payment. Notably, the impact is concentrated in cities where households have favourable housing affordability even without the HPF. Further simulations show that potential reforms of the HPF cannot solve housing unaffordability problems in superstar cities. This study highlights the divergence in the effects of the HPF between types of cities, and it provides a reference for the ongoing reform of the HPF.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call