Abstract

function and cough function information from their clinical records. We statistically analyzed comparison between groups, correlation and multiple regression analysis as a purpose variablewithRPCFby theSPSS (ver15.0J) forWindows (All level of significance is p< 0.05). We also calculated the cut-off value from the ROC curve demand sensitivity and specificity from the relationship of RPCF and VPCF and the presence or absence of aspiration risk by RSST. Results: R2 group were significantly lower compared to the R3 group in VPCF (R2 group1.2± 0.9 L/min, R3 group 2.7± 1.0 L/min) and RPCF (R2 group 2.3± 0.8 L/min, R3 group 3.0± 0.8 L/min) (p< 0.001). In addition, the paralyzed side function, cognitive function, non-paralyzed side function, activities of daily living, respiratory muscle strength, and swallowing function were also significantly lower in the R2group comparedwithR3group (p< 0.05–0.001). The total VPCF (1.9± 1.2 L/min) showed significantly lower value compared to RPCF (2.6± 0.9 L/min) in 42 cases, Between RPCF and VPCF it showed significant positive correlation (r= 0.80, p< 0.001). Cut-off value of VPCF was 2.35 L/min (90% sensitivity, 67% specificity, p< 0.01, AUC= 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.76–0.98), cut-off value of RPCF was also 2.6 L/min (sensitivity 71%, 81% specificity, p< 0.01, AUC= 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.90). Conclusion(s): In this study, both RPCF and VPCF have been shown to be useful as an evaluation indicating the risk of aspiration by using RSST in elderly patients with cerebrovascular disorders. Implications: This study will contribute to an evaluation and prevention of elderly patients with cerebrovascular disorder with the aspiration risk.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.