Abstract

Research has consistently demonstrated that testing prior to the presentation of misleading post-event information, within the context of a standard eyewitness misinformation paradigm, results in an increase in the misinformation effect. The present study investigated whether changes in misinformation susceptibility in the context of interim testing are affected by retention interval differences between misinformation presentation and final testing. Further, this study tested possible divergences in original and post-event learning between conditions where elaboration in processing of critical details was encouraged either indirectly, via interim testing, or directly, by visually emphasizing critical details. In two experiments, we compared three groups of participants. All participants were exposed to an event, presented with misleading post-event misinformation, and then given a final test on the original event. One group was given an interim test between the original event and the post-event synopsis. A second was presented with a post-event synopsis in which critical details were visually emphasized. A third group served as a baseline comparison group for which synopsis processing was not manipulated. All experimental phases occurred in a single session in Experiment 1. A 48-hour retention interval was inserted between the post-event synopsis and final test in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, we found that interim testing and emphasizing critical details increased misinformation susceptibility as compared to that found in the standard misinformation group. In Experiment 2, misinformation susceptibility was reduced in the interim testing group. These results suggest that interim testing and emphasizing critical details influence the rate of original detail forgetting. At a longer retention interval, the benefits of testing in learning emerged.

Highlights

  • Eyewitness memory researchers have long been concerned with factors that influence accurate memory for an originally witnessed event

  • We hypothesized that the positive influence on interim testing on memory performance would emerge in the context of the longer retention interval

  • When Interim Testing was compared with the Standard Misinformation group, we found main effects of item type (F(1, 172) = 39.15, P < 0.001, η2p 1⁄4 0:31) and of group (F(1, 86) = 27.18, P < 0.001, η2p 1⁄4 0:25)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eyewitness memory researchers have long been concerned with factors that influence accurate memory for an originally witnessed event. Towards this end, there has been a substantial amount of research dedicated to understanding the misinformation effect. In a typical misinformation experiment, participants witness an original event. After some retention interval participants are exposed to misleading post-event information in the form of a narrative or suggestive questions. Memory for the original event is assessed. The typical finding is that exposure to misleading postevent information results in reduced access to original event details and increased reporting of misleading postevent details (Frenda, Nichols, & Loftus 2011)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call