Abstract
In this article, we investigate in further detail the differences between quasi-static and dynamic penetration models based on the spherical cavity-expansion approximation for rigid ogive-nose long rod steel projectiles that penetrate aluminum targets at normal impact over a range of striking velocities. Comparisons of experimental data with predictions from a preveously published incompressible power-law strain hardening penetration model that includes target inertia effects derived from a spherical cavity-expansion solution show excellent agreement for striking velocities to 1800 m/s. However, predictions from a previously published incompressible penetration model derived from a quasi-static spherical cavity-expansion solution that neglects target inertia effects loses accuracy with increasing striking velocity. In this work, we illustrate the effects that target inertia has on the deep penetration of rigid ogive-nosed long rod steeel projectiles that strike aluminum targets with normal impact over a range of striking velocities. This comparison is achieved by employing the cavity-expansion approximation with solutions for quasi-static and dynamic incompressible power-law strain hardeniong spherical cavity expansion solutions. These results indicate that the magnitude of the target inertia effects depends on striking velocity, projectile geometry and nose shape, projectile density, and target material properties.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.