Abstract

Lithium (Li) metal anodes (LMAs) have been attracted world-wide attention as an ideal anode because of its extra-high theoretical capacity (3860 mAh g-1) and low electrode potential (-3.04 V vs S.H.E.). However, the dendritic growth of Li and low Coulombic efficiency (CE) are still hindering their practical uses [1]. To date, numerous methods such as construction of artificial solid electrolyte layer (ASEI) [2], adoption of 3D current collector [3], and tuning of the electrolyte composition [4] have been proposed to prevent Li dendrite growth and increase the CE. Among them, introducing functional additives is one of the most efficient approaches for practical application considering its cost-effectiveness. Until now, various functional additives were introduced to form stable and robust SEI layer in LMBs [4]. Among them, lithium nitrate (LiNO3) is considered as the most efficient electrolyte additive, ensuring high coulombic efficiency (CE) as well as long lifespan of LMBs. When LiNO3 is dissolved in the electrolyte, NO3 - anions are mainly reduced to form inorganic species such as Li3N, which has a high ionic conductivity and mechanical strength. As such species contribute to the construction of the robust and ionic-conductive SEI layer, and hence the reduction of NO3 - is important for stable Li cycling. In this regard, many researchers have focused on increasing reduction of NO3 - by using high-concentration LiNO3 [4], or adding solubilizer to increase more NO3 - in the electrolyte [5]. However, those remedies are still insufficient because most of them increase the viscosity of electrolyte leading to low kinetics, hence a novel and more efficient way to increase NO3 - reduction is needed for practical application.On the other hand, recent researches have reported that the preferential reduction of specific anions is possible by regulation of inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) structure [6]. For instance, Huang et al. reported that intermolecular force between PF6 - anions and surface adsorbent tris(trimethylsilyl) borate could derive in PF6 --abundant IHP, successfully resulted in LiF-rich SEI layer to increase the stability of LMA [6]. Inspired by those works, we expected that NO3 --derived SEI layer would be achieved by using surface adsorbent showing strong intermolecular interaction with NO3 -.In this context, we introduce the adoption of thiourea (TU) as a catalytic additive for the LiNO3 reduction during the SEI formation. Due to its unique molecular structure, addition of TU could induce NO3 - derived SEI layer. Firstly, TU could adsorb onto metallic surface by its S atom. Meanwhile, thiourea could form hydrogen bonding with NO3 - anion by its N-H bonds [7]. Hence in the presence of TU, we suggest that NO3 --abundant electrode surface would be achieved by interaction between TU-NO3 -, resulting in Li3N-rich SEI layer.The adsorption behavior of TU on the Cu electrode was investigated by potential of zero charge (PZC) measurement (Figure 1(a)). As the TU concentration increases, PZC decreases, indicating more surface coverage by TU. Figure 1(b) shows 1H NMR spectra of electrolytes with different components. Upshift displacement of N-H bond of TU were detected after addition of DME and LiTFSI, indicating that intramolecular H-bond of TU were weakened. By contrast, downshift displacement appeared when LiNO3 was added, which means NO3 - would form strong hydrogen bonding with TU. Furthermore, linear scanning voltammetry (LSV) curves at different concentration of TU were measured to investigate the effect of TU on electrolyte reduction (Figure 1(c)). The distinct peaks at 1.6 V and 1.3 V in the cell with 5 wt% LiNO3 indicate reduction of LiNO3 and LiTFSI, respectively. Interestingly, in the presence of TU, negative potential shift and increased current of those redox peaks were shown, indicating that the TU significantly increases the LiNO3 reduction.Importantly, from the XPS analysis, it was found that more abundant Li3N components are in the ASEI layer with TU than that without TU, implying that TU accelerates the reduction of LiNO3 (Figure 2(a-b)). As a result, Li|Cu@ASEI with TU shows better cyclability and higher average CE of 96.44% during 80 cycles compared to Li|Cu@NSEI and Li|Cu@ASEI w/o TU (Figure 3). In addition, morphological and chemical investigation on the favorable ASEI layers assisted by TU, and its electrochemical performance in LMBs will be discussed in this presentation.[1] Cheng et al, Chem. Rev, 117, 10403, 2017.[2] Lopez Jeffrey, et al. JACS 140.37 (2018): 11735-11744.[3] Yang Chun-Peng et al. Nature communications 6.1 (2015): 1-9.[4] Kang et al. Journal of Power Sources 490 (2021): 229504.[5] Zhang et al. Advanced Materials 32.24 (2020): 2001740.[6] Huang et al. Angewandte Chemie. 60.35 (2021): 19232-19240.[7] Nishizawa et al. Tetrahedron letters 36.36 (1995): 6483-6486. Figure 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.