Abstract
Since experimental erosion testing is rarely feasible in the engineering practice, the estimate of erosion is often performed by numerical simulations. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes are often equipped with utilities for wear estimation which rely on a well-established methodology. However, besides requiring stringent assumptions, this methodology involves a number of sub-models and parameterizations which, being difficult to define a priori, are potential sources of uncertainty. The objective of this work is to investigate how the erosion estimates are affected by the different sub-models and parameters of a CFD-based wear prediction model, so that its actual predictive capacity may be established. We referred to the benchmark case of the abrasive jet impingement test which, despite being widely studied both experimentally and numerically, highlights all the issues of impact erosion modelling. A systematic activity of simulation of previous experiments revealed the key role played by some fluid-dynamics related quantities, such as the formulation of the particle equation of motion, besides the erosion model. Moreover, it allowed providing guidelines for increasing the reliability of the estimates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.