Abstract

Effective biofilm removal from surfaces in the mouth is a clinical challenge. Cavitation bubbles generated around a dental ultrasonic scaler are being investigated as a method to remove biofilms effectively. It is not known how parameters such as surface roughness and instrument distance from biofilm affect the removal. We grew Strepotococcus sanguinis biofilms on coverslips and titanium discs with varying surface roughness (between 0.02–3.15 μm). Experimental studies were carried out for the biofilm removal using high speed imaging and image analysis to calculate the area of biofilm removed at varying ultrasonic scaler standoff distances from the biofilm. We found that surface roughness up to 2 μm does not adversely affect biofilm removal but a surface roughness of 3 μm caused less biofilm removal. The standoff distance also has different effects depending on the surface roughness but overall a distance of 1 mm is just as effective as a distance of 0.5 mm. The results show significant biofilm removal due to an ultrasonic scaler tip operating for only 2s versus 15-60s in previous studies. The technique developed for high speed imaging and image analysis of biofilm removal can be used to investigate physical biofilm disruption from biomaterial surfaces in other fields.

Highlights

  • More than 2 million dental implants are placed worldwide every year, with estimates suggesting an increase in the prevalence of dental implants in the USA of up to 23% in the 10 years [1, 2]

  • If the plaque is not removed it could eventually lead to implant failure [6, 7] Dental plaque is a biofilm, a community of micro-organisms adhered to a surface [8]

  • In general biofilm removal decreased by 5–10% at 2 mm compared to 0.5 mm, but for the ThermanoxTM coverslips, a higher surface roughness resulted in less biofilm disruption, decreasing from approximately 30% at 0.5 mm to approximately 10% at 1 mm and less than 5% at 2 mm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 2 million dental implants are placed worldwide every year, with estimates suggesting an increase in the prevalence of dental implants in the USA of up to 23% in the 10 years [1, 2]. Dental implants require maintenance over time to manage the formation of dental plaque [3]. Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory reaction with bone loss around the implant [4, 5]. If the plaque is not removed it could eventually lead to implant failure [6, 7] Dental plaque is a biofilm, a community of micro-organisms adhered to a surface [8]. Biofilms are more resistant to traditional antimicrobials than free floating bacteria, physical methods of biofilm disruption are of interest to study [9,10,11,12,13].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call