The effect of standardized feeding protocol on early outcome following gastroschisis repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundImproved post-operative outcomes following gastroschisis repair are attributed to advancement in perioperative and post-operative care and early enteral feeding. This study evaluates the role of standardized postoperative feeding protocols in gastroschisis. Study designA systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from January 2000 to April 2019 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and Google Scholar was conducted. Primary outcomes were duration to full enteral feeding and cessation of parenteral nutrition. Secondary outcomes included days to first enteral feeding, length of stay, compliance, complication and mortality rates. Meta-analysis was done using the RevMan Analysis Statistical Package in Review Manager (Version 5.3) using a random effects model and reported as pooled Risk Ratio and Mean Difference. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsEight observational cohort studies were identified and their data analyzed. Significant heterogeneity was noted for some outcomes. Standardized feeding protocols resulted in fewer days to first enteral feeding by 3.19 days (95% CI: -4.73, -1.66, p < 0.0001) than non-protocolized feeding, less complication rates, reduced mortality and better compliance to care. The duration of parenteral nutrition and time to full enteral feeding were not significantly affected. ConclusionProtocolized feeding post-gastroschisis repair is associated with early initiation of enteral feeding. There is a likelihood of reduced rates of sepsis; shorter duration of parenteral nutrition, length of hospital stay and time to full enteral feeding. However, the latter trends are not statistically significant and will require further studies best accomplished with a prospective randomized trial or more cohort studies.