Abstract
Bubbles are important for carbonated beverage quality since smaller bubbles contribute to higher acceptability. Therefore, the effects and acceptability of the application of audible sound in carbonated water were studied using three brands and applying five frequencies for one minute each in ascending order. Six samples, two from each brand, were used for treatments: (i) control and (ii) sonication. Physicochemical measurements consisted of total dissolved solids (TDS), electric conductivity (EC), pH, bubble size, and bubble size distribution. A sensory session (N = 30) was conducted using the Bio-Sensory application to assess acceptability and emotions using self-reported and biometric responses. Statistical analysis included: ANOVA (α = 0.05) and principal component analysis (PCA) for quantitative data and Cochran Q test with pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05) for self-reported emotion responses. Results showed that the sonication effect for the sample with higher TDS, EC, and pH (SPS) reduced bubble size by 46%, while in those with lowest TDS, EC, and pH (IceS) caused an increase of 158% compared to the control. For samples with intermediate values (NuS), there were non-significant differences (p > 0.05) compared to the control. Acceptability was higher for samples with sonication for the three brands. Emotional self-reported responses were more positive for samples with sonication, showing significant differences (p < 0.05) for emotions such as “happy” and “pleased” during both sound and visual assessments. From PCA, a positive relationship between bubble size and liking of bubbles was found as well as for the number of medium bubbles and happy facial expression. The audible sound generated by ubiquitous sound systems may potentially be used by the industry, applying it to the bottled product to modify bubble size and improve quality and acceptability of carbonated beverages.
Highlights
Carbonated water is the beverage classified by either natural carbonation or gas injection categories depending on the source of the product
Samples SP had the highest value for the three parameters (TDS = 443, electric conductivity (EC) = 941, pH = 5.5), while Ice presented the lowest values (TDS = 48, EC = 101, pH = 4.5)
Results from total dissolved solids (TDS) and EC are positively related to arousal, while pH was positively related to Liking Sound
Summary
Carbonated water is the beverage classified by either natural carbonation or gas injection categories depending on the source of the product. The first category corresponds to the water obtained from springs in which carbon dioxide (CO2 ) is produced naturally [1], while gas injection corresponds to water from any source which is carbonated by incorporating CO2 at high pressure [2]. The importance of carbonated water in the market relies on its rapid growth rate in terms of volume sales within the category of bottled beverages as it is selected as an alternative to still water and soft drinks. Carbonated water is preferred by most consumers because it is seen as more enjoyable due to the fizzing sensation [5] and healthier than soft drinks by adults; children perceive fizziness to be more attractive [6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
