The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have shown a favorable effect on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their efficacy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without T2DM has not yet been analyzed.ObjectiveTo assess the cardiovascular and renal effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with CKD with and without T2DM, including all CKD patients in the current literature.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Scopus for randomized controlled trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors that evaluated cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD, or trials in which these patients were a subgroup. We defined 2 primary outcomes: a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, and a composite renal outcome. For each outcome, we obtained overall hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals by using a random effects model.ResultsWe included 14 randomized controlled trials. SGLT-2 inhibitors decreased the hazard for the primary cardiovascular outcome (HR 0.76; [95% CI 0.72–0.79]) and the primary renal outcome (HR 0.69; [95% CI 0.61–0.79]) in patients with CKD with or without T2DM. We did not find significant differences in the subgroup analyses according to diabetes status, baseline eGFR values or the type of SGLT-2 inhibitor used.ConclusionIn patients with CKD, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors in addition to standard therapy conferred protection against cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Further research on patients with non-diabetic CKD should be done to confirm the utility of these medications in this population. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021275012).

The use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been limited, primarily because glycaemic efficacy is dependent on kidney function. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM and CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library until 7 August 2018 and websites of the US, European and Japanese regulatory authorities until 27 July 2018 for data from randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors that included reporting of effects on biomarkers, cardiovascular, renal or safety outcomes in individuals with T2DM and CKD. Random effects models and inverse variance weighting were used to calculate relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. Data were obtained from 27 studies with up to 7363 participants involved. In patients with T2DM and CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors lowered glycated haemoglobin (-0.29%; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.19) as well as blood pressure, body weight and albuminuria. SGLT2 inhibition reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94) and heart failure (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78), without a clear effect on all-cause mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01). These agents also attenuated the annual decline in eGFR slope (placebo-subtracted difference of 1.35 mL/1.73 m2 /y; 95% CI, 0.78-1.93) and reduced the risk of the composite renal outcome (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95). There was no evidence of additional risks with SGLT2 inhibition in CKD beyond those already known for the class, although heterogeneity was observed across individual agents for some safety outcomes. Currently available data suggest that, despite only modest reductions in glycated haemoglobin, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with T2DM and CKD, without clear evidence of additional safety concerns.

Cardiovascular and renal impairment are the most common complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). As an emerging class of glucose-lowing agents sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), possesses beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with T2DM. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of different SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular and renal outcomes for patients with T2DM when compared with placebo. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library from inception through November 2021. Randomized clinical trials enrolling participants with T2DM were included, in which SGLT2 inhibitors were compared with each other or placebo. The primary outcomes including all-caused mortality, Cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure), and the renal composite outcomes (worsening persistent microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria, new or worsening chronic kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, or renal death). The data for the outcomes were pooled and recorded as Hazard rations (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CLs). Two researcher independently screened the trials and drawn the data. Ten trials enrolling 68,723 patients were included. Compared with placebo groups, Canagliflozin [HR, 0.85 (95%CI, 0.75–0.98)], ertugliflozin [HR, 0.93 (95%CI, 0.78–1.11)], and sotagliflozin [HR, 0.94 (95%CI, 0.79–1.12)] were associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. Canagliflozin [HR, 0.84 (95%CI, 0.72–0.97)], dapagliflozin [HR, 0.88 (95%CI, 0.79–0.99)], empagliflozin [HR, 0.62 (95%CI, 0.49–0.78)], ertugliflozin [HR, 0.92 (95%CI, 0.77–1.10)], and sotagliflozin [HR, 0.88 (95%CI, 0.73–1.06)] were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular mortality; Canagliflozin [HR, 0.64 (95%CI, 0.53–0.77)], dapagliflozin [HR, 0.71 (95%CI, 0.63–0.81)], empagliflozin [HR, 0.65 (95%CI, 0.50–0.85)], ertugliflozin [HR, 0.70 (95%CI, 0.54–0.90)], and sotagliflozin [HR, 0.66 (95%CI, 0.56–0.77)] were associated with a reduction in hospitalization for heart failure. Dapagliflozin [HR, 0.55 (95%CI, 0.47–0.63)], Empagliflozin [HR, 0.54 (95%CI, 0.39–0.74)], canagliflozin [HR, 0.64 (95%CI, 0.54–0.75)], sotagliflozin [HR, 0.71 (95%CI, 0.46–1.09)], and ertugliflozin [HR, 0.81 (95%CI, 0.63–1.04)] were associated with a reduction in the renal composite outcome. All SGLT2 inhibitors showed a reduction in cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, renal composite outcomes and all-cause mortality. Canagliflozin and empagliflozin seemed to have the same efficacy in reducing hospitalization for heart failure, but empagliflozin had advantage in reducing cardiovascular mortality, whereas dapagliflozin most likely showed the best renal composite outcomes.

Background and Aim: Some large clinical trials using SGLT2 inhibitor revealed the superiority in the renal outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. We already reported that SGLT2 inhibitor improved urinary albumin-creatinine ratio at baseline (ACR) in Japanese T2DM patients with CKD and revealed some factors that influence to the renoprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitor. The aim of this study is to clarify how the concomitant insulin treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor influence the renal composite outcome. Research Design and Methods: We retrospectively assessed 624 patients with Japanese T2DM patients with CKD who underwent SGLT2 inhibitor treatment for more than 1 year. We set the renal composite endpoint that was the progression of the stage of albuminuria or the decrease in eGFR by ≥15% per year. For comparative analyses, we performed the cohort model of patients with or without insulin treatment that was used propensity score (PS) matching methods. The PS matching was using the following algorithm: 1:1 nearest neighbor match with a ±0.04 caliper and no replacement. Further, all patients were stratified into quintiles based on the corresponding PS and included in the analyses. Results: The comparison of 149 PS-matched patients in each group were performed. The incidence of renal composite outcome was significantly higher in patients with insulin treatment than without it (n=23[15.4%] and n=10[6.7%], respectively, p=0.033). The results from the analysis depending on the quintiles of all patients by the Mantel-Haenszel method, there was a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.021) and the odds ratio for the renal composite outcome was 2.09 (95%CI,1.15, 3.80, p=0.016) in patients with insulin treatment. Conclusion: The concomitant insulin treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor influenced the renal composite outcome in Japanese T2DM patients with CKD. Disclosure K. Kobayashi: None. M. Toyoda: None. H. Sakai: None. K. Tamura: Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. N. Hatori: None.

Introduction: The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were initially demonstrated in recent trials. However, the magnitude of renal benefits for CKD patients with different baseline features and underlying diseases remains unclear.Method: We systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021 to identify eligible trials. The primary outcome was a composite of worsening kidney function, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or renal death. Efficacy and safety outcomes were stratified by baseline features, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, proteinuria, and renal function.Results: A total of nine studies were included. These studies included 25,749 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 12,863 patients with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) >300 mg/g. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of the primary renal outcome by 30% in patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.58–0.83], I2 = 0.00%) and by 43% in patients with UACR > 300 mg/g (HR 0.57, [95% CI 0.48–0.67], I2 = 16.59%). A similar benefit was observed in CKD patients with type 2 diabetes. SGLT2 inhibitors had no clear effects on renal outcomes in patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 combined with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.51–1.06], I2 = 0.00%). However, they reduced the risk of major renal outcomes by 46% (HR 0.54, [95% CI 0.38–0.76], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and macroalbuminuria (defined as UACR > 300 mg/g). SGLT2 inhibitors did not significantly reduce the risk of major renal outcomes in CKD patients with heart failure (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2: HR 0.81, [95% CI 0.47–1.38], I2 = 0.00%; UACR > 300 mg/g: HR 0.66, [95% CI 0.41–1.07], I2 = 0.00%). SGLT2 inhibitors showed consistent renal benefits across different levels of eGFR (P interaction = 0.48).Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary outcome in CKD patients. However, for patients with different features and underlying diseases, there exists differences in the renal protective effect.

Background:Many studies have shown the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on type 2 diabetes, but the effects in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease.Methods:We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 30, 2020 and included randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in adult type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reporting estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and/or urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) changes and/or acute kidney injury or failure (AKI). Random effects models were adopted to measure the pooled outcomes.Results:Nine studies with 8826 participants were included. SGLT2 inhibitors were not associated with a significant change in eGFR (mean difference (MD), −0.75 ml/minutes per 1.73 m2, 95% CI −1.61 to 0.10, P = .09) in type 2 diabetic patients with CKD. UACR reduction after SGLT2 inhibitors was significant in type 2 diabetic patients with CKD (MD −24.27 mg/g, 95% CI −44.46 to −4.09, P = .02). SGLT2 inhibitors associated with AKI in the patients were significant (OR 0.80, 95% CI [0.66 to 0.98], P = .03).Conclusion:SGLT2 inhibitors had no significant effect on kidney function (eGFR measured) in the pooled analysis. And SGLT2 inhibitors effectively reduced UACR in T2DM with CKD. Besides, SGLT2 inhibitors could reduce the incidence of AKI.

Finerenone and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), while the relative efficacy has not been determined. The databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for relevant cardiovascular or renal outcome trials of SGLT2i or finerenone. The end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), nonfatal stroke (NS), myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular death (CVD), and renal composite outcome (RCO). Network meta-analysis was performed using Bayesian networks to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The probability values for ranking active and placebo interventions were calculated using cumulative ranking curves. 1024 articles were searched, and only 9 studies were screened and included in this meta-analysis with 71793 randomized participants. Sotagliflozin (HR 0.72 95%CI 0.59-0.88, SUCAR=0.93) and canagliflozin (HR 0.80 95%CI 0.67-0.97, SUCAR=0.73) can significantly reduce the risk of MACE compared with placebo. Canagliflozin (HR 0.64 95%CI 0.48-0.86, SUCAR=0.73), sotagliflozin (HR 0.66 95%CI 0.50-0.87, SUCAR=0.69) and empagliflozin (HR 0.65 95%CI 0.43-0.98, SUCAR=0.68) can significantly reduce the risk of HHF compared with placebo. Empagliflozin (HR 0.62 95%CI 0.43-0.89, SUCAR=0.96) can significantly reduce the risk of CVD compared with placebo. Empagliflozin (HR 0.61 95%CI 0.39-0.96, SUCAR=0.74), canagliflozin (HR 0.66 95%CI 0.46-0.92, SUCAR=0.63), and dapagliflozin (HR 0.53 95%CI 0.32-0.85, SUCAR=0.88) can significantly reduce the risk of RCO compared with placebo. Finerenone has reduced the risk of MACE, MI, HHF, CVD and RCO to varying degrees, but they do not show significant difference from placebo and each SGLT2i. Both SGLT2i and finerenone could reduce the risk of MACE, HHF, MI, CVD, RCO. Finerenone has no obvious advantage than SGLT2i on the effects of cardiovascular and renal protective. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022375092.

To review the role of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), including the effects on renal and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. A literature search of MEDLINE databases (1964 through May 2018) was conducted utilizing key words sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and diabetes; additional limits for drug names were added. Available English-language data from reviews, abstracts, presentations, and clinical trials of use of SGLT2 therapy specifically detailing outcomes on CV and renal disease in humans were reviewed. This review will explore the role of the SGLT2 inhibitors on CV and renal outcomes in patients with T2DM. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: A paradigm shift regarding the regulation of medications for the treatment of T2DM has resulted in the need for CV outcomes data as part of the drug approval process. Reduction of major CV events and progression of nephropathy in patients with T2DM represent major outcomes of clinical significance. Few medications have been able to establish a reduction in these end points; data for the use of SGLT2 inhibitors are favorable in this regard. The SGLT2 inhibitors represents a class of medications that reduce glucose levels via a novel and complementary mechanism. Emerging evidence suggests a plausible explanation for the observed reduction in adverse renal and CV outcomes in recent clinical trials. Questions remain whether these agents reduce renal disease risk greater than achievement of the same glycemic goals as other antidiabetics and whether CV and renal benefits are reproducible in high-risk patients with chronic kidney disease.

Background: Both sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1Ras) showed robust evidences for not only cardiovascular but also renal outcomes and the combination treatment of these drugs is increasing in clinical practice. We previously reported that the preceding drug did not influence the renal outcomes in patients with these combination treatments. We also reported the importance of post blood pressure (BP) management for the renal outcomes in SGLT2i-treated patients, however, it is poorly surveyed in patients with the combination treatment. Method: A retrospective study was conducted in 418 patients who were treated with both SGLT2i and GLP1Ra. The progression of the albuminuria stage, the eGFR decline of ≥30%, or both were defined as the renal composite outcome. The cut off value of post-treatment mean arterial pressure (post-MAP) were calculated using receiver ROC curve analysis. The patients were divided into two groups by the cut-off value and propensity score (PS) matching method was performed for comparisons between the two groups. Results: The calculated cutoff value of post-MAP was 87.3 mmHg and the patients were divided into two groups: 281 patients in post-MAP≥87.3 group and 137 patients in post-MAP&amp;lt;87.3 group. Of the 111 PS-matched patients in each group, the renal composite outcome after the combination treatment was observed in 38 patients (34.2%) in post-MAP≥87.3 group, which was significantly higher than in 18 patients (17.1%) in post-MAP&amp;lt;87.3 group (p=0.005). The progression of albuminuria stage was significantly more frequent in post-MAP≥87.3 group (23.4%) than post-MAP&amp;lt;87.3 group (8.1%) (p=0.004), however no significant difference was observed for the eGFR decline of ≥30%. Conclusion: Poor BP management after combination treatment of SGLT2i and GLP1Ra treatment worsened the renal composite outcomes, especially the progression of albuminuria stage. Disclosure K. Kobayashi: None. M. Toyoda: None. D. Kawanami: None. K. Tamura: None.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication that increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and kidney failure. Recent therapies, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors, show promise in improving outcomes. However, evidence of their comparative effectiveness in reducing CV and renal outcomes is scarce. We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and clinical trial registries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2014 and 2024. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of antidiabetic drugs on cardiorenal outcomes. Primary outcomes were (1) major adverse CV events (MACE), (2) composite renal outcomes, (3) all-cause mortality. Other outcomes included heart failure (HF), stroke, macroalbuminuria, and a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >40% or renal replacement therapy. Twenty-six studies with 143 296 participants with T2DM and CKD were included. SGLT2 inhibitors were highly effective in reducing the risk of renal outcomes such as composite events (P-score: 0.94), eGFR decline >40% or renal replacement therapy (0.99) and CV outcomes such as MACE (0.93) and HF (1.00) followed by GLP-1 RA. While GLP-1 RA was particularly effective in reducing the risk of MI (0.87), macroalbuminuria (0.86) and stroke (0.83) compared to SGLT2 inhibitors. Both SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists are highly effective (0.83) in reducing all-cause mortality. DPP-4 inhibitors had limited benefits compared to SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RA. SGLT2 inhibitors followed by GLP-1 RA provide strong benefits for CV and kidney health in patients with T2DM and CKD. SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrate superior benefit over GLP-1 receptor agonists for HF and renal outcomes, highlighting their preferred role in these clinical scenarios.

The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on cardiovascular and renal outcomes has not been systematically reviewed across baseline kidney function groups. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) with SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with and without CKD. We performed a PubMed/Medline search of randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven outcome trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors versus active or placebo control in patients with and without diabetes from inception to November 2022. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (PROSPERO registration CRD4202016054). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure, major adverse cardiovascular events, CKD progression, all-cause mortality, treatment discontinuation, and acute kidney injury (AKI). The relative risk (RR) was estimated using a random-effects model. Twelve RCTs were included in this meta-analysis (89,191 patients, including 38,949 with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2). Use of an SGLT-2 inhibitor in patients with CKD was associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular death (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79–0.95) and of heart failure (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.61–0.75), compared with placebo. Heart failure risk reduction with SGLT-2 inhibitors was larger among patients with CKD compared with patients without CKD (RR for the interaction 0.87, 95% CI 0.75–1.02, and p-value for interaction 0.08). SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a lower incidence of CKD progression among patients with pre-existing CKD: RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.68–0.88), compared with placebo. Among patients with CKD, a lower risk of AKI (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72–0.93) and treatment discontinuation was seen with SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with placebo. SGLT-2 inhibitors offer substantial protection against cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with CKD. These results strongly advocate in favor of using them in patients with CKD and keeping them as kidney function declines.

AimsTo compare the effectiveness of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors in reducing haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) variability and improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high HbA1c variability.MethodsThis territory‐wide cohort study involved patients with T2DM and an HbA1c variability score (HVS) >60% who initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP‐4 inhibitors in Hong Kong between 2015 and 2022. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust for confounders. The primary outcome was post‐treatment HVS within 3 years. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and serious renal events (SRE).ResultsAmong 20,205 T2DM patients with a baseline HVS >60%, 4,612 SGLT2 inhibitor users were 1:1 matched with DPP‐4 inhibitor users. When referencing the 0%–20% quintile, patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP‐4 inhibitors exhibited a reduced likelihood of being in higher HVS quintiles [21%–40%: odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.88; 41%–60%: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.65; 61%–80%: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42–0.56; and 81%–100%: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.34–0.47]. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.60–0.79] and SRE (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63–0.80) compared to DPP‐4 inhibitors.ConclusionIn patients with high HbA1c variability, SGLT2 inhibitor initiation was associated with superior effectiveness in reducing HbA1c variability compared to DPP‐4 inhibitors. The initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP‐4 inhibitors was linked to significantly reduced cardiovascular and renal adverse events.

New Glucose-Lowering Agents for Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Background: The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on renal outcomes in patients with varying combinations of heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear. Methods: Online databases were queried up to May 2023 for primary and secondary analysis of trials of SGLT2i in patients with HF, CKD, or T2DM. Outcomes of interest were composite renal endpoint (defined as an eGFR &lt;15 mL/min/1.73 m2, doubling of serum creatinine, some percent change in eGFR, and/or need for kidney replacement therapy) and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope. Hazard ratios (HR) and mean difference with their 95% confidence intervals were pooled using the generic inverse variance method and a random-effects model. Results: 10 trials (n=70,117 patients) were included. Compared with placebo, SGLT2i reduced the risk of composite renal endpoint by 35% in HF (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.84), 38% in CKD (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.54-0.71), and 37% in DM (HR:0.63; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.73). A similar pattern of benefit was observed in different combinations of these diseases ( Figure 1 ), as well as patients without baseline HF (HR:0.57; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.63), CKD (HR:0.64; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.98) and T2DM (HR:0.62; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.86). Findings were similar for change in eGFR slope. Conclusions: SGLT2i improve renal outcomes in cohorts of HF, CKD and T2DM and these effects appear consistent across patients with different combinations of these conditions.

The overall effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 15-30ml/min per 1.73 m2) remain unclear, and we thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney, cardiovascular (CV), and safety outcomes in patients with advanced CKD. The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 3, 2022, and reporting effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney, CV, or safety outcomes in patients with advanced CKD. From 2675 records, six RCTs with 2167 participants were included in the quantitative analyses. In patients with advanced CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of the primary kidney outcome (a composite of worsening kidney function, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or kidney death) by 23% (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p = 0.04, I2 = 0 for the heterogeneity) and slowed the annual decline in eGFR slope, with the difference between SGLT2 inhibitor group and placebo group being 1.24mL/min/1.73m2 per year (95% CI 0.06-2.42, p = 0.04). SGLT2 inhibitors were also associated with a decreased risk of primary CV outcome (a composite of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure) (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96, p = 0.03, I2 = 0 for the heterogeneity) and with similar risks of adverse events (such as acute kidney injury, fracture, amputation, and urinary tract infection). Among patients with advanced CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risks of primary kidney and CV outcomes and attenuated the progressive decrease in eGFR compared with placebo, with no evidence of additional safety concerns. These observed benefits may support continuing the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with advanced CKD before initiating maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation. Future large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the robustness of these results.