Abstract
Although prior research suggests both institutional pressure and organizational efforts shape firms’ legitimacy, few studies have examined whether these effects are persistent or may decay in a long historical context. Using a sample of 147 sin stocks (tobacco, alcohol, and gambling) from 1978–2014 as a natural experiment, we draw on institutional theory to find that pressure from restrictive normative and regulative institutions jointly contribute to the accumulation of sin stocks’ illegitimacy and are negatively associated with performance. However, firms can decouple themselves from this illegitimacy through reputation or unrelated diversification, to improve performance. Media attention moderates these relationships.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.