Abstract

Slackline has been proposed as a challenging and motivating tool for balance training. However, the transferability of balance performances among different balance tasks has been questioned. This study aimed to assess if slackline training affects dynamic and static balance performances on stable and unstable surfaces. Eighteen healthy males (8 to 14 years) were randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. For six weeks, both groups performed several supervised sports activities (2-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week). Additionally, the experimental group underwent a slackline-based balance training (1-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week). The dynamic and static balance were tested before and after the interventions using the Bass test (BASS) and the Stork stand test (SST), respectively. Landing (BASS landing ) and balance (BASS balance ) components of the dynamic balance were evaluated, while the static balance was assessed with eyes open (SST open ) and closed (SST closed ) on a stable surface, and with eyes open on an air cushion (SST ac ). Two-way mixed-design ANOVAs revealed no interaction effect between time and group allocation in BASS landing (p = .791), BASS balance (p = .641), and right leg SST open (p = .177), SST closed (p = .076) and SST ac (p = .039), and left leg SST open (p = .100) and SST closed (p = .032). There was a significant interaction on left leg SST ac (p = .004), showing higher improvements over time in the experimental (mean improvement = 4.5 seconds, p < .001) compared to the control group (mean improvement = 0.9 seconds, p = .236). In conclusion, slackline balance training yielded no or negligible improvements on dynamic balance performances, whereas the improvements seemed higher on static balance, especially when measured on an unstable surface.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call