Abstract

BackgroundExperimental studies have suggested that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors provide cardiovascular protective effects. We performed a randomized study to evaluate the effects of sitagliptin added on to the conventional therapy compared with conventional therapy alone (diet, exercise, and/or drugs, except for incretin-related agents) on the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery, a surrogate marker for the evaluation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods and FindingsWe used a multicenter PROBE (prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint) design. Individuals aged ≥30 y with T2DM (6.2% ≤ HbA1c < 9.4%) were randomly allocated to receive either sitagliptin (25 to 100 mg/d) or conventional therapy. Carotid ultrasound was performed at participating medical centers, and all parameters were measured in a core laboratory. Of the 463 enrolled participants with T2DM, 442 were included in the primary analysis (sitagliptin group, 222; conventional therapy group, 220). Estimated mean (± standard error) common carotid artery IMT at 24 mo of follow-up in the sitagliptin and conventional therapy groups was 0.827 ± 0.007 mm and 0.837 ± 0.007 mm, respectively, with a mean difference of −0.009 mm (97.2% CI −0.028 to 0.011, p = 0.309). HbA1c level at 24 mo was significantly lower with sitagliptin than with conventional therapy (6.56% ± 0.05% versus 6.72% ± 0.05%, p = 0.008; group mean difference −0.159, 95% CI −0.278 to −0.041). Episodes of serious hypoglycemia were recorded only in the conventional therapy group, and the rate of other adverse events was not different between the two groups. As it was not a placebo-controlled trial and carotid IMT was measured as a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis, there were some limitations of interpretation.ConclusionsIn the PROLOGUE study, there was no evidence that treatment with sitagliptin had an additional effect on the progression of carotid IMT in participants with T2DM beyond that achieved with conventional treatment.Trial RegistrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000004490

Highlights

  • Atherosclerosis, often caused by hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia, causes ischemic diseases of the brain, heart, and kidney, which increase mortality and morbidity worldwide

  • In the PROLOGUE study, there was no evidence that treatment with sitagliptin had an additional effect on the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) beyond that achieved with conventional treatment

  • Epidemiological studies have shown that the mortality caused by T2DM is equivalent to that resulting from coronary artery disease (CAD) [2,3,4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atherosclerosis, often caused by hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia, causes ischemic diseases of the brain, heart, and kidney, which increase mortality and morbidity worldwide. It has been suggested that an increased carotid IMT is strongly associated with the presence of CAD in people with T2DM [11]. We performed a randomized study to evaluate the effects of sitagliptin added on to the conventional therapy compared with conventional therapy alone (diet, exercise, and/or drugs, except for incretin-related agents) on the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery, a surrogate marker for the evaluation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sitagliptin and Carotid Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes received honoraria from pharmaceutical companies including MSD. A full list of competing interests is provided in S6 Text

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call