Abstract

BackgroundThis study examines the effects of a shift in medical coverage, from National Health Insurance (NHI) to Medical Aid (MA), on health care utilization (measured by the number of outpatient visits and length of stay; LOS) and out-of-pocket medical expenses.MethodsData were collected from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2010–2016). A total of 888 MA Type I beneficiaries and 221 MA Type II beneficiaries who shifted from the NHI were included as the case group and 2664 and 663 consecutive NHI holders (1:3 propensity score-matched) were included as the control group, respectively. We used the ‘difference-in-differences’ (DiD) analysis approach to assess changes in health care utilization and medical spending by the group members.ResultsDifferential average changes in outpatient visits in the MA Type I panel between the pre- and post-shift periods were significant, but differential changes in LOS were not found. Those who shifted from NHI to MA Type I had increased number of outpatient visits without changes in out-of-pocket spending, compared to consecutive NHI holder who had similar characteristics. However, this was not found for MA Type II beneficiaries.ConclusionOur research provides evidence that the shift in medical coverage from NHI to MA Type I increased the number of outpatient visits without increasing the out-of-pocket spending. Considering the problem of excess medical utilization by Korean MA Type I beneficiaries, further researches are required to have in-depth discussions on the appropriateness of the current cost-sharing level on MA beneficiaries.

Highlights

  • This study examines the effects of a shift in medical coverage, from National Health Insurance (NHI) to Medical Aid (MA), on health care utilization and out-of-pocket medical expenses

  • Characteristics of the study population Eight hundred eighty-eight beneficiaries underwent a shift in medical coverage from NHI to MA Type I, and 221 beneficiaries experienced a shift in medical coverage from NHI to MA Type II

  • Unlike the findings from previous studies that MA beneficiaries remain in hospital longer than the general population [24, 25], we found that the shift to MA did not increase length of stay (LOS) significantly when compared to groups with similar characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study examines the effects of a shift in medical coverage, from National Health Insurance (NHI) to Medical Aid (MA), on health care utilization (measured by the number of outpatient visits and length of stay; LOS) and out-of-pocket medical expenses. South Korea has often been acclaimed for providing universal medical coverage for its entire population in only 12 years [1]. The Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system began by providing cover for industrial workers in large corporations in 1977. Along with the NHI, a Medical Aid (MA) program was simultaneously initiated in 1977 as part of a South Korean social welfare program, called the National Basic Livelihood Security System, which supports poor people in need of medical assistance. Type I covers those who are socially deprived and or incapable of working (those aged under 18 or over 65; disabled people; those with severe and rare diseases, and other special cases) [3, 4]. Type II covers those who are socially deprived but are capable of working [3, 4]. Type I beneficiaries are not required to provide copayments for any medical utilization, whereas Type II beneficiaries have minimum copayment rates of up to 15% [3, 4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call